<body><style type="text/css"> #header { padding: 0; margin: 0; position: relative; height: 100px; background: #FFFFFF; border-bottom: 1px solid #0074C4; font: 11px 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; /* Resets 1em to 10px */ color: #444; } ul.menu { margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; bottom: 0; left: 20px; width: 90%; } ul.menu li { display: inline; margin: 0; } ul.menu, ul.menu li a { padding: 5px 15px 6px; } ul.menu li a { font-size: 1em; color: white; margin: 0; background: #000000; text-decoration: none; } ul.menu li a:hover { background: #0074C4; color: white !important; text-decoration: none; } ul.menu li.current_page_item a, ul.menu li.current_page_item a:hover { color: #FFFFFF !important; background: #0074C4; text-decoration: none; } </style> <form action="../../../../../cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000110A/x-proxy/start" method="post" target="_top"> <!-- Begin Publisher Code --> <script src="../../../../../publisherJS.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> initAdversal("b120075ce62dd78b6155ae4282225e28", true); </script> <!-- End Publisher Code --> <div id="header"> <ul class="menu"> <li class="current_page_item"><a href="http://www.allgeeks.info/" title="Blog">Blog</a></li> <li class="page_item">Myspace Train of Password stealers</li> <li class="page_item">Unblock Myspace Everywhere</li></ul> </div> <center> Location&nbsp;via&nbsp;proxy:<input name="URL" size="66" value="http://artlife.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html"><input type="submit" value="Go"> &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="../../../../../cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000110A/http/artlife.blogspot" target="_top">[&nbsp;UP&nbsp;]</a> &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="/" target="_top">[Manage&nbsp;cookies]</a> <hr> </center> </form> <iframe width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="../../../../../files/_blogspot_com_search_70xzbd7k8kktxzoy8szynq" id="navbar-iframe" height="30px" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>

the art life

"...it's just like saying 'the good life'".

Logomania

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

It begins - as it always does - in darkness.




Production logos are the logos of film studios. The earliest examples date from around 1909. The roots of the production logo are found in the cards that were used in live theatre and vaudeville to announce the names of lead performers and the company footing the bill for the production. Film production logos began more or less with the birth of commercial cinema and usually featured the movie title and a copyright notice.



The best known of the logos is arguably that of 20th Century Fox. The 1934 merger of 20th Century Films and Fox Film Corporation created the classic and highly recognisable symbol of the joining of two corporate entities. Nearly all of the current major Hollywood studios have logos that date from the early 20th century. - MGM's logo is the oldest still in use - although now mainly as a distribution logo - and dates from 1924. The second oldest is Paramount and was originally used in 1928





The logos of the major studios are among the most recognised trade marks in the Western world and could be considered the "blue chip" brands of entertainment, easily ranking in recognisability next to brands such as Kodak and Coca-Cola. These production logos include classic and highly recognisable elements; Fox's searchlights, Universal's globe, Paramount's distant mountain, Warner's shield and iconic "W", MGM's lion, Columbia's torch bearer, Disney's castle, Tristar's pegasus, United Artist's stylish initials, Orion's outer space.




The highly compressed narrative of the production logo is the revelation of the production company name accompanied by some form of symbolic rendering of that name. Universal's world logo [seen here in its mid-1970s version] is a slow reveal of the Earth in space with the company name slowly appearing on top. The more recent logo is a high tech version of the same narrative. Nearly all of the classic production logos offer some alternative version of this idea and with only the exception of Paramount, are accompanied by a fanfare.




"The Greek logos has a wide range of meanings, and designates both a rational or intelligible principle and a structure or order that provides phenomena with an origin, or that explains their nature...



“…In Christian theology, the logos becomes the Word that was with God and that was made flesh when it was incarnated in Christ. The opening verse of the fourth Gospel provides the most sublime example of logocentrism: 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God'. The critique of logocentrism is a central feature of Derrida’s Deconstruction. According to Derrida Western philosophy from Plato onwards has always been logocentric in that it makes speech, or the logos, the origin and site of truth, which privileges the phonic aspect of language at the expense of the graphic aspect of writing.” David Macey, The Dictionary of Critical Theory, Penguin Reference, 2000,



“When we look at the world around us, we do not, as a rule, see changes in light flux over time. We see solid objects moving and standing still in a well-defined three-dimensional space (at least, that is see in the most focused, central area of our vision). Nothing would be visible, however, were it not for the "light flux" entering our eyes through the pupil and flowing over the photosensitive cells lining the back of our eyeballs. Experiments have shown that when the retinal cells receive a steady, unchanging fit, when the stimulus is absolutely fixed and unvarying, the cells quickly "tire." They stop sending the information our brain needs to construct the visual world we see lying in front of our eyes. Thus there -as to be a "flux,” a movement of light over the retinal cells, otherwise we see nothing at all […] "All eyes are primarily detectors of motion," R. L. Gregory points out, and the motion they detect is of light moving on the retina. Only by these changing patterns of illu­mination can the world outside our eyes communicate with the visual processes of the brain. From that communication emerges our visual world.”

The Camera-Eye, Dialectics of a Metaphor, William C. Wees, in The Cinematic Imaginary after Film, ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2003.



"In 3D computer graphics, 3D modeling is the process of developing a mathematical, wireframe representation of any three-dimensional object (either inanimate or living) via specialized software. The product is called a 3D model. It can be displayed as a two-dimensional image through a process called 3D rendering or used in a computer simulation of physical phenomena. The modeling process of preparing geometric data for 3D computer graphics is similar to plastic arts such as sculpting." - Wikipedia.



The classic Fox logo dates from the 1950s when a static version was replaced by an animated and widescreen version suitable for use with Cinemascope presentations. The current computer animated version dates from 1994. Logos are a kind of brand archeology, not just displaying the various stakeholders in the company of the day, but also the types of technology available to render the logo.


"Brands that influence culture sell more; culture is the new catalyst for growth." - Simon Williams, The 10 New Rules of Branding.



In his book Life Style, US designer Bruce Mau recounts his company's unsuccessful bid to redesign the Universal logo. After a careful analysis of the logo - substituting other round objects for the Earth [a ball, a berry, a pollen spore] and varying the font - Mau concluded that the logo had only two components; a circle dissected by a line. The one element that was unique to the Universal logo was the camera movement over the Earth, the creation of a illusionistic three-dimensional space eerily reminiscent of the physical space between the viewer and the screen, or to step back further, to the title cards used for theatre productions.



For films released in Australian cinemas in 2006, productions by US studios accounted for 85.9 percent of the market share worth $774.1 million. Films from the UK accounted for 5.3 percent of the market [worth $45.8 million], while Australian films accounted for just 4.6 percent of the market [worth $40 million]. The "rest of the world" [Europe, India, New Zealand, 'other'] accounted for the remainder of the market worth a combined total of $866.6 million. [Figures - 2006 Box Office Backgrounder, Australian Film Commission, January 2007.]



"Architectural design conceived as part of an overall brand strategy can effectively demonstrate the promise behind a brand. An architect with Seattle’s NBBJ remarks "Branding is the chemical reaction in the back of your head that happens when you are exposed to a brand. For instance, when I’m exposed to Volvo, I think of safety. Physical space in a building speaks to you the way branding does. Architecture is a form of branding; it is more than making a place functional. It can affect emotions and decisions, just like great marketing does.'" - Emotional Branding - Whisperbrand.com



"In 1967 Jack Warner sold the studio to Seven Arts, Inc. The new company's logo was a simple animated "W7" inside a shield accompanying the credit "Warner Bros.-Seven Arts Presents" over the opening shot or credit sequence background and was first used on Reflections In A Golden Eye. When Kinney Services bought the company and changed its corporate name to Warner Communications, they first chose a stylized shield as a new logo, used initially on Dirty Harry (1971); then, beginning in 1973, a stylized oval with a "W" in it." - Everything You Wanted To Know About American Film Company Logos But Were Afraid To Ask by Rick Mitchell, Hollywood Lost & Found.


Classic film production logos have cultural cache and serve as temporal markers for when the film was made as well as its social context. There are many examples of contemporary films using period production logos to help set the tone for the following story - two notable recent examples are David Fincher's Zodiac, which used a late 1960s version of the Warner Bros. logo, while Steven Soderbergh's The Good German used a late '40s version.




Although brand marketing states that a target audience aways appreciates a sense of gratitude, branding can also work against the content of a film. Touchstone Pictures are seen as specialists in 1980s camp classics with such titles as Ruthless People [1986], Outrageous Fortune [1987] Turner & Hooch [1989] cementing its reputation. Although the company has also produced many 'quality' movies [The Royal Tenenbaums, O' Brother Where Art Thou] Touchstone Pictures will forever be associated with Earnest Goes To Camp.



"Pegasus was the winged horse best known for his association with the Greek hero Bellerophon. The manner of the horse’s birth was unusual, to say the least. Its mother was Medusa, the Gorgon, who in her youth was famed for her beauty, particularly her flowing hair. Many suitors approached her, but the one who took her virginity was Poseidon, who is both god of the sea and god of horses. Unfortunately, the seduction happened in the temple of Athene. Outraged by having her temple defiled, the goddess Athene changed Medusa into a snake-haired monster whose gaze could turn men to stone. When Perseus decapitated Medusa, Pegasus and the warrior Chrysaor sprang from her body." - Ian Ridpath's Star Tales.


"News Corporation revenue for the year ended June 30, 2005 was US$23.859 billion" - Wikipedia.



"Style is merely the outside of content, and content the inside of style." - Jean-Luc Godard.


Presented as part of Pecha Kucha, July 27.

Labels: , ,

Wall Paper: Art & Life In HKSAR

After 156 years of British rule Hong Kong reverted back to Chinese rule in 1997. It's now officially known as Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). From an international centre of trade and commerce with a population largely uninterested in politics, the new Hong Kong with its three very different cultures – traditional Chinese, communist Chinese and British capitalism/democracy – is becoming increasingly political. The younger generation, most of whom are well educated and articulate, are starting to speak out at what they see as the suppression of the many rights they once enjoyed.




The work of artist Tsang Kin- Wah reflects some of these social and political realities and is seen by many as one of the 'new' Hong Kong's most interesting voices.

Tsang Kin Wah was born in 1976 in Guangdong China and migrated to Hong Kong in 1984. He travelled and studied at London's Camberwell College of Arts, before returning to Hong Kong. His work is at the most direct level a play between the difference between appearance and reality, and can be described as quaint and acidic. Wah's Wall paper series (Untitled works 2003/2004, Interior 2003) are hand printed wall papers in the traditional pattern design of William Morris and when installed covers every inch of the gallery space. On its surface the work appears very "British ", very elegant, very controlled and very tranquil. Tsang received the Prize of Excellence in the 2001 Hong Kong Biennale as well as various prizes in painting, watercolour and drawing - which shows through in the obvious attention to craftsmanship in the Wall Paper installations - a surface of beauty and elegance that masks a deep anger, dissatisfaction and frustration that only becomes apparent on closer examination.

Wall Paper uses text as a visual image not unlike the work of another Chinese artist Xu Bing. Wah acknowledges that both calligraphy- which in Chinese culture is considered one of the highest art forms, and Xu Bing, has been an influence. Where Bing makes it a point that his calligraphy is unreadable and where the Chinese 'calligraphy' is in fact not Chinese characters at all but something invented by artist - Wah's work is are elegant surfaces that need to be read as text for the whole work to emerge.



When you move closer and read the text, you realise that the words making up the patterns of plants and flowers are texts that simmer with resentment and anger: fuck, fuckers, fuckingwealthycunts, Fuckingmaterialists, fuckthepoorman.

We asked Wah about this duality in his work. Was this play on a beautiful surface that hides an ugly reality the essence of his work? "This is one of the main ideas, or you can say that is the most powerful thing in my works that switch the viewer's point of view from one to another extreme. For me, this is one of the things that we experience a lot but forgot sometimes. Nice appearance equals nice interior? I don't think so. To some extent, my work is also a reflection of myself which seems pretty shy and quiet but has much anger towards different things that happen around me."

In an interview about his work for Shanghai Magazine Wah explained, "[The work is] a space of criticism, of contradiction, of nastiness. What the viewer see is selectively presented by the creator, it indicates that some information is either consciously or unconsciously being left out by the creator. To doubt, to explore, to challenge the traditional perspectives that exist can create a new dimension, to enable you to investigate what's considered as 'normal' or 'obvious' around you in a critical manner. You can then create a new perspective to inspect everything."

Wah's anger perhaps stems from his background. In general, based on current political events, it is safe to say that the people of Hong Kong are angry. It's the kind of anger that runs deep, the kind of anger that may not be noticeable on the surface but it is definitely simmering away. Speaking about his work Wah commented, "This contradictory space is like human condition. To live in the society, we have to suppress our emotions be it happiness or sadness. There is just no way out to express it. When you see the foul language in these wallpapers, you will suddenly realise those are the messages you want to scream out aloud, messages left behind or hidden in your heart."




Before the handover Hong Kong and its people weren't much interested in politics. What mattered was commerce, the market, profit, having a good life style. Hong Kong was the essence and a symbol of a free market economy. Making money and staying away from politics was almost a lifestyle. Very few people wanted to disrupt the system that was giving them access to every kind of material goods one could imagine and a lifestyle comparable to, and perhaps even better, than many of those found in western countries.

After 1997, the arrangement "one country, two systems" meant that China could restrict the rule of law and many basic democratic rights. On the 1st July 2003, the Chinese/Hong Kong Government decided to control freedom of public speech and proposed to amend the basic law known as Article No. 23 which meant censorship of the kind Hong Kong people hadn't experienced. In response, a new class of well educated, young professionals with western democratic ideals began to form a popular democratic movement all over the Territory. People began missing the things they'd taken for granted - freedom of speech, freedom of free assembly and free expression - be it economic, political or artistic.

Wah's work is a reflection of this political reality and is thus intended to be read on several layers - the floral image for example is highly indicative of sex and sexual organs – again another cultural taboo in the new Hong Kong. By using floral imagery Wah manages to address this taboo and yet be "acceptable".

We asked Wah whether the play between appearance and reality in his work was a way of subverting certain types of cultural taboos, or even censorship of presenting a somewhat harmless looking work on the surface but one that is actually quite subversive? "The socio-political situation in Hong Kong did affect me quite a lot in the past and still at this moment. I would watch the news report everyday and look at the people or things that happened around me. Many queer or weird things gave me much inspiration for my work. Hong Kong is not subversive and that's why I want to challenge it... or may be because I really hate it."

The younger generation have unique problems created by an education system operating under the notion of "one country with two systems". Currently schools teach in two languages and two sets of values. Young people in Hong Kong also have to deal with values, propaganda/ information from a media controlled by the communist Chinese and the values of their parents and grand-parents from a more democratic past.

Hong Kong doesn't totally belong to the British or the Chinese - it's a mixture of both cultures. Passports are stamped with the phrase British National Overseas - but without any of the rights or privileges that come with being a recognised citizen of the United Kingdom - an illusion - an appearance of belonging to something that really does not match reality. For years the joke of 'having no identity was a unique identity', was the common response by many Hong Kong citizens dealing with a schizophrenic identity.

Wah's artistic career is in fact is a bit like watching Hong Kong – he belongs to the long history and culture of China but then again maybe not. He lived for some time with British culture and can function well in it, reference it, play with it as one would with something that is not only familiar but that you have internalized as your own- and yet it is not your own – the invitation to stay has expired….

At the end of our interview we went back to an earlier phrase that struck us. Wah had said, "When you see the foul languages in these wallpapers, you will suddenly realise those are the messages you want to scream out aloud, messages which are left behind or hidden in your heart."

This to us spoke of repression, yet it seemed that Wah was still a successful artist. His work has been shown in some prestigious exhibitions and he's received numerous prizes, accolades, scholarship and residencies. It seems that instead of being repressed or censored, Wah's work is actually accepted, shown and praised. Wah was not unaware of the irony. "Yes, my work has been shown in some 'prestigious' exhibitions and it seems that my work has been accepted but I don't think that they really understand or accept my works," he explained. "I remember some cultural administrator once told me that they like the images of my works but not the text…"



Between appearance and reality, Tsang Kin-Wah highlights the importance of engaging with the world not as it seems but as it actually is. The point of course is to figure out the difference. We have the artists intentions to go by - that it's an institutional critique. We have the institution supporting the very criticism intended for it - effectively swallowing up the work and nullifying the artist's position along the way. It's hard to know where to stand - an objective impossibility in the face of mismatched reality, leaving wide spread cognitive dissonance and a schizoid world-view in its wake.

The idealist part of our brains says that an artist's intention counts - and that his success is in some ways is also his failure. Art is made from a certain innocent belief that it can provide an alternative and unmask political sleights of hand (that gives as as it takes away) The more realist part of our brains meanwhile says that institutions subsume everything thrown their way - and that it's better to be heard than not, and that playing for real means knowing after all the rules of the game - and beating it. While the cynical and jaded parts of our head howls out that if art and life is hide and seek game called appearance versus reality - then institutional criticism is after all just one position amongst many, and that there is such a thing as rebellious conformism.

Maybe its one of these or all of these things...

The joker in the pack on the other hand thinks that what matters in the end (in art as in life) is perhaps neither appearance nor reality - but that works for whatever they are worth will be made, despite or in spite of it all - and sanest are those who can do so in laughter.

From The Art Life's HKSAR Special Correspondents

Labels: , ,

Mission Statement

Thursday, July 26, 2007
Who are we, The Art Life? It seems incredible that in our fourth year of operation some readers are still asking that question, not just in who we are, literally, but what’s this blog all about?

First of all, the “anonymity issue” was never an issue for us because we knew that at some point in the future that question would eventually answer itself. And so it has. It leaves us in the rather unusual and somewhat unexpected position of many people knowing who we are, yet we don’t know who you are. Ah, the irony!



The other question – what’s it all about? – comes amid requests for a closer definition of what we do. That’s easy - this a blog about the Sydney contemporary art scene. A blog is like a diary, a bit like a web site, yet it’s a lot more informal than a magazine, has fewer resources than a TV show or a newspaper, and it’s put together for no other reason than it seemed like a good idea at the time.

There’s an expectation among our readers that we do certain things, do them regularly, and to do them without fail. The Art Life has had three major changes over its life. The first was the switch from twice-a-week publishing to once a week, the second big change was when we went fortnightly, an the third was when we started podcasting alongside our other usual content while adding notices of interesting looking upcoming shows. We’re anticipating a fourth iteration as we start to accept reviews and stories from more guest bloggers and continue to explore the vast content reserves of sites like Myspace and YouTube for interesting material we think you’d like. That’s what a blog is, and that’s who we are.

Our other major feature, which hasn’t changed since we kicked off back in February 2004, was to feature reviews of exhibitions. The frequency and number of those reviews has gone up and down as we have had our time eaten up by other Art Life-related projects, but we’ve stuck with it. Always. The philosophy of this blog has never been explained in detail because we thought it was obvious – but perhaps it isn’t, so here it is in nutshell: we believe in a positive engagement with what’s happening. We decided to embrace the here and now, to find what was worth talking about, the good stuff, to encourage and celebrate it. Our crusade is righteous and yes, God is on our side. That is our mission.

Labels:

Auto Destruct Sequence

Who ever said ideas had to be subtle? If you want cut through, why even bother with artistic ambiguity? Just say what you have to say and off you go. This seems to be Joan Fontecuberta’s concept for his show Googlegrams at the Australian Centre for Photography. Taking his cue from those image collage programs where lots of tiny pictures make up one really big picture, Googlegrams uses a bit of software that trawls through images found on the web for the building blocks of the bigger pictures. For example, Fontecuberta uses tiny images of politicians who decided to invade Iraq to make up a really big picture of a body with its head blown apart or an image of UFOs made up of tiny images the people who claimed to have seen them.



If this idea reminds you of anything it should be those photo mosaic pictures using exactly the same idea that you can buy in poster shops and tourist souvenir stores. Fontecuberta hasn’t really done anything different to the commercial application of the work and can be at least credited with a brutal sort of simplicity that takes all the subtlety out of a process. Unfortunately it’s not really a process that has much room for irony. In the gallery there’s a computer set up which visitors can test out their own ideas with a series of basic templates – the Australian flag, John Howard’s face, an outback landscape. If you decided to use Fontecuberta’s program to create an Australian flag out of – say – Indigenous art – you might be saying something about Australia and it’s relationship to its Indigenous people. If on the other hand you enter “Teletubbies” + “Thomas The Tank Engine” + “Anal Porn” [as we did] you get an Australian flag made up of La La, Po, Tinky Winky, Dipsy, Thomas and Friends, and hot back door action. What does it mean? Probably nothing.

The room sheet claims that the tension in the image is not between the scale of the images, or that the small images have some sort of conceptual interplay with the large image, but that the real interest here is the interplay between different flows of information from the “fundamentally uncritical space of the internet” from which the images are derived. It’s an interesting proposition to consider that the image is invested with criticality when we would have thought the criticality is the context, and more importantly, in the way in the image is interpreted, that is, by the audience, without whom Fontecuberta’s work would be meaningless. This is the connection between Googlegrams and d/Lux/MediaArts d/art/07. You can tell by all the capitalization and forward slashes that d/Art/07 is a new media exhibition and, if you a hankering for a video wall, an online virtual Pony Club, and some almost random seeming video works, it doesn’t disappoint. If on the other hand you expect your ‘post cinema’ experience a little more substantial than a room of monitors and some wall texts that escaped proof reading, avoid.


Tracey Moffatt, Roslyn Oxley is my dealer in Sydney, 2007.
Archival ink on rag paper, 74x53cms. Edition of 5 + 2AP.
Courtesy Roslyn Oxley Gallery.


There’s nothing much good to be said about Tracey Moffatt’s show Portraits & Doomed at Roslyn Oxley Gallery [until Saturday], a suite of almost identical portraits of friends, family, fellow artists and people she met at parties. Moffatt continues her fascination with celebrity, the logical connection between this slim body of work and her previous shows Under The Sign of Scorpio and Fourth. It may be that some of these people are well known – Eubena Nampitjin, Roslyn Oxley, Marina Abramovic - or others are unknown – her brother Lloyd for example - but Moffatt treats them all as if they were destined for the pages of New Weekly. She’s given the titles of the work jokey by-line style bios such as Anne Slater is a New York Socialite or Francisco Costa is a designer for Calvin Klein Fashions in New York and Eubena Nampatjin is a painter who lives in the desert. The idea is there for all to see, the images are garish and so another year and another show by Tracey Moffatt.


Tracey Moffatt and Gary Hillberg, Doomed, 2007.
10 mins dur. continuous loop, edition of 499.
Courtesy of Roslyn Oxley Gallery.


Moffatt has a new DVD for her show made with her long time video art collaborator Gary Hillberg. Following on from similar compilation videos Doomed is a series of frenetically edited clips from disaster movies set to a never ending build up on the score. Doomed shows that anyone with access to a video archive and iMovie can make a video art – the problem is that it’s not very good. One need only take a cursory look at what younger video artists are doing with this set of tools to see that Moffatt’s working is lacking – as a video it has no logical construction, it blasts along with its bits and pieces assembled ad hoc style, no build up or let down. Sure, the world ends, but the world ends every day. Meanwhile we have to admit to being mightily impressed with artist’s chutzpah. The DVDs – in an edition of 499 and selling fast – are available for USD$800 each. There has to be a law suit in there somewhere.


Michael Landy, H.2.N.Y. Self-Constructing, Self-Destroying Sculpture, 2007.
Oil stick on paper, 152 x 244 cm.
Copyright the artist.
Courtesy Sherman Galleries, Sydney and Thomas Dane Gallery, London.


Michael Landy is the UK artist famous for destroying everything he owned as part of an art work called Breakdown. Staged in a disused shop on Oxford Street in London in 2001, the set up was like a factory, with a moving production line of yellow plastic boxes in which each of Landy’s possessions were placed – his passport, personal papers, clothing, books, art works – weighed, recorded and the destroyed, literally everything the guy owned. Not even his childhood bear survived [Teddy, nooooo!!!]. Since then Landy has no doubt been building up his possessions again, or at least his passport, as he has a show called Man In Oxford Street Is Auto-Destructive at Sherman Galleries and he’s been out here for the opening and an artist talk.

Man In Oxford Street Is Auto-Destructive is an exhibition of large oil stick drawings in which Landy pays homage to Jean Tinguely’s Homage to New York, 1960, a sculpture that was supposed to auto-destruct in a performance in the sculpture court of the Museum of Modern Art, but instead shook a bit, then caught on fire, then was put out. Auto-not-destructing if you will. The connection between the title of Landy’s show at Sherman refers to both his own now infamous Breakdown and yr standard art historical antecedents.

The show at Sherman is set up as a kind of mirror image of Landy and Tinguely. Up the front of the gallery is a looped screening of a documentary of the 1960 event made by legendary documentary maker D.A. Pennebaker and a shorter version made by Robert Beer, then there are the big drawings of the Tinguely machine in reverse white on black in the main space, and then down the back of the gallery a looped screening of a documentary of Breakdown. The symmetry of the show is close to perfection. The problem we found with this otherwise excellent show is that it doesn’t leave much room for the imagination, impressive and as tight as the whole concept is. We like a bit of wiggle room for the audience to move about in, but Landy’s whole project - despite its low key razzamatazz - is far and away the best thing going on right now, so hell, we’ll take it without reservations.

Labels: , , ,

Terminus Last Days

Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Terminus projects have curated 5 site specific projects for their 2007 programme. Visit Terminus Projects for more info, ending soon!



Yuca Ishizuka
Missing Links: Autobiography
Location: Level 4, 1-5 Hickson Road, The Rocks
When: 12-6pm, Wednesday to Sunday, nutil the end of July 2007


Japanese artist Yuca Ishizuka has installed an amazing work called 'Missing Links: Autobiography' in a historic warehouse in The Rocks. Ishizuka's project features the installation of 30,000 Swarovski crystal beads, referring to characters of NuShu, a writing system understood only by Chinese women of the Hunan Province.The exact origin of Nushu script is unknown but some believe it dates back 1000 years. Sadly now obsolete, NuShu was initially created to foster solidarity between Chinese women that endured the brutalities of feudal China. All the elements in the installation are composed to rhyme with the state of Nushu. Contemplating the effects of a global Asian diaspora, this delicate installation will elevate ancestral voices whose language is under threat of extinction.

Supporting academic documents about Nushu by prof. Orie Endo of Bunkyo University are also available on site.

Screening in conjunction with 'Missing Links: Authobiography' is Canadian based Yue-Qing's moving documentary about her travels through China in search of NuShu.

Labels:

Video Art 1895

Tuesday, July 24, 2007


Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat
(The Lumière Brothers, 1895) from YouTube.

Labels:

How To Talk To Others

Monday, July 23, 2007
It seems like a good time to remind everyone that there are rules for leaving comments on The Art Life...




But first, the story so far. Unlike many blogs these days - notably the comments left on old media websites such as The Australian - we don't impose many rules on comments. You can say pretty much whatever you like. We angsted for a long time over whether we should a] moderate all comments b] make people leaving comments use their real names c] get rid of comments or d] leave it as is. We even put it to a vote.

Eventually we decided to impose an easy-to-understand policy: The Art Life reserves the right to edit, delete and ban posts that are libelous, defamatory or unnecessarily abusive. We also reserve the right to impose this policy arbitrarily and capriciously.

Here are some guidelines: libelous comments are those that make claims about other people that diminish the reputation of that person, their ability to make a living and effect their professional standing in the community; defamatory comments are those make specific allegations or claims about a person; and abuse is extreme, vitriolic and assaultive language with no other specific purpose than to belittle and diminish that person.

There are grey areas in this policy - for example, can you call someone a "boring old bastard"? If it's in the context of a debate or argument about a subject, we'll probably let it go through. Can you call someone a "boring c__t?" Well, probably not. Hopefully you can see the difference.

Labels:

Test Results: Crazy In The Coconut

Fig 1.



A week or so ago we offered our readers the chance to assess their personalities with our FREE NO OBLIGATION PERSONALITY TEST. All you had to do was answer truthfully each of the 50 questions selected to assess your PSYCHOMETRIC PROFILE which we could then match to a series of PSYCHIATRIC INDEXES [and so on] until we could find an answer to the question: what sort of reader are you? We also offered a prize. Incredibly, three people sent in their answers. Since it was offered in good faith, just send us your postal addresses and we'll send you a little something in the mail.


Rachel A**

1. I have not seen a car in the past ten years - False
2. I feel sorrier for strangers than close friends - True
3. I enjoy reading books of fiction - True
4. Flaws in others disgust me - True
5. My partner's genitals remind me of those of an animal - False
6. I am more conservative than risk taking. false
7. Sometimes I get very nervous - True
8. I am talkative, open and relatively easy to read - False
9. I more often introduce myself to strangers than strangers introduce themselves to me - False
10. I consider myself more of a doer than a thinker - False
11. I like to set goals before beginning a project - False
12. I like to follow schedules - False
13. I am easily distracted - True
14. I have had sex outdoors/in a public place/at a beauty spot - True
15. I lose important things/documents - False
16. I think it is OK to bend the rules to complete a task on time - True
17. I enjoy long weekends - False
18. I once built a model airplane that flew - True
19. When I was a child, I collected stamps - True
20. I like to repair mechanical things in my home - False
21. I am inclined to be slow and deliberate in my actions- False
22. When someone disagrees with me, I refuse to listen to his/her point of view - False
23. I often buy things on impulse - True
24. I often change my interests - True
25. I can find the good in even the most disagreeable people - False
26. Lincoln was a better president than Washington - True
27. I am cautious in novel situations - False
28. The thought of leaving red marks on my partner's body makes me ill - true [unless we are talking in a sexy way, then perhaps false].
29. I am more irritated by desultory people than sappy people - False
30. People should shift interpretive frames rather than gather more facts - True
31. I prefer people to be ineffable than elite - True
32. I seem to speak without thinking some times - True
33. I need someone to tell me that I have done a good job in order to feel good about my work - True
34. I don't think of myself as having my head "in the clouds" - False
35. I find it easy to put myself in someone else's shoes - False
36. I can't stop thinking about my problems - True
37. It upsets me to see someone in pain - False
38. I can usually sense what someone is feeling without having to ask him/her - True
39. When I've offended someone in the past, I could never really understand why they took it so badly - True
40. When people ask me a question I find obvious, I purposely respond using words even a child can understand - True
41. When I'm feeling down, I remind myself to focus on the good things in my life instead of the bad. sometimes
42. I have had sex in the bathroom of a friend/family member - False
43. When I get angry I have little self control - True
44. The opinions of others bore me - True
45. I always try to see the other person's point of view - False
46. I masturbate often, sometimes more than once a day. true
47. People often invite me out to social functions such as dinners and parties - False
48. My interest in politics is often confused by others as anger or resentment - False
49. I cannot see "magic eye" pictures - True
50. I never liked my parents - True


Fig 2.




Kuba D**

1. False 2. True 3. True 4. False 5. False 6. True 7. True 8. False 9. True 10. False 11. True 12. False 13. False 14. True 15. False 16. True 17. True 18. False 19. True 20. True 21. True 22. False 23. False 24. True 25. True 26. False 27. False 28. False 29. True 30. True 31. False 32. True 33. True 34. True 35. True 36. False 37. False 38. True 39. False 40. False 41. False 42. True 43. False 44. True 45. True 46. False 47. False 48. False 49. False 50. False

John D**

1. False 2.True 3. True 4. False 5. False 6. False 7. True 8. False 9. True 10. False 11. True 12.True 13. True 14. True 15. True 16. True 17. True 18. True 19. True 20. False 21. False 22. False 23. True 24. False 25. True 26. True 27. False 28. False 29. False 30. True 31. True 32. True 33. False 34. True 35. True 36. True 37. False 38. True 39. True 40. False 41. True 42. False 43. True 44. False 45. False 46. False 47. False 48. True 49. - 50. -

Labels: ,

Children of The Sun

The Manufacture of Sky Light
MARGARET ROBERTS



Appease the Sun / Beata Geyer, 2007



Opening Wednesday 1 Aug, 6 - 8pm.
Thursday 2 Aug to Saturday 11 Aug, 1 - 6pm
At Factory 49, 49 Shepherd St, Marrickville 2204




The Manufacture of Sky Light will be composed of yellow-pigment drawings on high table-like structures that are intended to fabricate the manufacture of sky light through their location on the factory floor and their resemblance to the light visible through the roof above. It is a continuation of an earlier work, Appease the Sun, which, though now dismantled, is documented in the attached image with visitor, Beata Geyer. I hope to be able to document The Manufacture of Sky Light with its visitors before it too needs to be dismantled.

Image: ©photograph by Margaret Roberts

Factory 49 Director Pam Aitken BVA(HONS), MVA
Showroom 49 Shepherd St, Marrickville, Sydney 2204
Hours Thurs - Sat, 1 - 6 pm (+61) 2 9572 9863




*




Brisbane-based artists Myriam Raymond and Jacina Leong will present their work in the collaborative project Words: Open Close. The exhibition surveys the ambiguous nature of language and the ability for truth to be revealed or remain obscured behind its reading.

*


PIA LARSEN - SINE WAVES

You are invited to attend the opening of the exhibition on Tuesday night 31 July from 6 to 8pm



Pia Larsen, Untitled, 2007.
Drypoint/relief printmedia, 1150 x 725mm.


The work in the exhibition, ‘Sine Waves,’ consists of wearable objects in metal, shaped prints in colour, and corporeal ‘LP’s’ ‘playing’ on customized turntables. Apertures and swirling lines appear within the metal and paper forms, reminiscent of bodies and the organs within them. The old technology of the LP record has morphed into parts of the body such as the female breast and hair whorl, each spinning new grooves.

EXHIBITION DATES 1 TO 18 AUGUST 2007
SECOND GALLERY ROOM
WED TO SAT 11 TO 6

DAMIEN MINTON GALLERY
61-63 GREAT BUCKINGHAM STREET REDFERN


*




Click to enlarge


*


EXPERIMENTA AT THE SOFITEL

Sofitel Melbourne
25 Collins Street
Open every day, 24 hours
FREE
10th August – 26th September


Visit the Sofitel Melbourne and discover Experimenta at the Sofitel, the first exhibition of interactive artworks and video installations that is open 24 hours, 7 days a week.

Showcasing works by Australian and international artists the exhibition provides a tasty, bite-sized sample of cutting edge art and creative technology. The artworks are audience favourites from Experimenta’s national and international touring programs over the past few years.

A couch that growls when it is sat upon and purrs when touched, a motion sensor activated video work that is startled by a visitor’s approach are two of the works on display in the foyer of the hotel. Video works by well-known international artists Hiraki Sawa (Japan) and June Bum Park (Korea) explore the theme of illusions and transform reality of daily life into fantastic moments of wonder.

The exhibition is free and open to the public. Experience the weird and wonderful creations for yourself.

Ants

Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Hello. How are you? Would you like a cup of tea? These questions are rhetorical, since we can neither hear you nor actually give you a cup of tea. But let's just imagine the cup of tea is conceptual and that the thoughts of you being well are sincere and genuine...




Contributions: The Art Life is now accepting reviews, articles and other items of interest from our readers for publication on this here blog. It's a casual, friendly kind of relationship and we welcome all comers on the understanding that contributions will be vetted for suitability and edited for clarity and style. Since we're into this new phase of the blog, we're also crediting names with contributions, so you can use your real name and bask in the adulation of your peers, or you can use a pseudonym like James Tiptree Jr, or some sort of amusing nom de guerre... Please welcome our first newcomer, Carrie Lumby in the post below humorously entitled Shit Hot Or Not. If you'd like to contribute to The Art Life, send an email to us at theartlife[at]hotmail.com

Mailing List: "What gives", you ask, "I used to get weekly updates from the Art Life and now nothing?!!" This is the problem. Our old account at Hotmail [which we still use for correspondence] decided that our credit was no good anymore and we are now barred from sending more than 200 emails a day in batches of no more than 50 at a time. We moved the whole mailing list over to Gmail only to discover they too have a daily limit and no customer support since they are Google and rule the world and have no need of us mere ants. We are currently looking into new hosting and hopefully we'll get back to some semblance of blogging normality soon.

Critics Corner: If you've dropped by to exercise your democratic right to tell us how shit we are, please do so in the space provided below under the Venice Biennale Hee-Haw post. If you're a visual kind of person, take note of the smiling donkey [or ass, if you prefer].

New Look: We're currently working on a new look for this blog. We've been very happy with the Kubrick For Blogger style we adopted two years ago but things have changed, Blogger allows for all sorts of exciting widgets, so stand by for a very thrilling, exciting and frankly off-the-shelf update. Woo hoo.

Labels: , ,

1968 And All That

The end must have really been something to see. Right on the edge of real radical political change, the period from ‘67 to ‘72 was a period of world wide dissent and ferment. Paris, sure, beneath the streets the beach and all that, but Mexico, Brazil and Japan too. It was a global resistance to the forces at the frozen heart of Cold War politics. In that bygone era lines of communication were incredibly slow and the local versions of international radical politics and art that suddenly sprang up couldn't’t be ignored. Small cultural moments such as a protest rally, a song, a film, a stage play or a magazine had an effect far beyond their physical limitations. Culture was important and independent of the forms that delivered it. A magazine might be sold for profit but that wasn’t its motivation, and it might have had only 1,000 copies printed, but each one had such importance that it was valued beyond mere newsprint.


Reuben Keehan, A Farewell to Photography. Installation view.
Courtesy Sarah Cottier Gallery.


When the Cold War melted and consumers were pacified with better products and fewer options, the ferment turned to soda. The 68-72 period formed a kind of cultural bedrock on which the Marxist late 70s, the Post Modern Period, and Hyper Capitalist Now, would be built. The collateral cultural – the books, the magazines, the movies -took on fetish qualities for the survivors and everyone else who followed, some, like us, people who were taught by comrades, and for others, the students of students of students. And that’s where Rueben Keehan comes in.

His debut solo show with Sarah Cottier Gallery is called A Farewell to Photography, a series of paintings memorializing long lost detritus from the Golden Age. Provoke was published in Japan from late 1968, a magazine dedicated to radicalizing the practice of photography not just in its subject matter – down and outs, underground culture– but also in its approach using distressed, torn and overexposed images. Perversely perhaps, the magazine cover didn’t actually feature photographs, just an artfully designed masthead in English, a line of explanatory text in Japanese and an issue number.


Reuben Keehan, Autumn 1968, 2007.
Acrylic on canvas, 91x91cms. Courtesy Sarah Cottier Gallery.


Keehan’s work is also an act of perversity taking such an obscure starting point for what is essentially a homage to a lost of era. The title of the show makes the relationship between the object, the painting, and the source – an imageless image source – an ironic launch pad for unhealthy obsession between object-subject relationships. The paintings are beautifully done and reinforce the homage element to the point of emotional piquancy. The other unsettling element to this series of works isn’t all that apparent, and certainly not so when viewed in an opening crowded with well wishers and nouveau pioneers. And that’s silence. When you look at these paintings it feels like the world is crashing down in slow motion. A silent end that never stops ending.

A similar kind of silence can be found in Nigel Milsom’s work in his show with Chris Hanrahan called Living On Luck at the National Art School. The silence in Milsom’s paintings may be because, like Keehan, he’s also using photography as a starting point. Milsom was looking at the work of Disfarmer [1884-1955], a self-taught photographer who did portraits of neighbours, towns folk and passersby in Herber Springs, Arkansas during the early 20th century.


Nigel Milsom, Untitled (spirit ditch), 2007.
Oil on Linen, 50 x 60cm. Private collection.
Courtesy of the artist.

Milsom has taken on Disfarmer’s front-on, photo portrait style and created a stunning series of paintings. Like his last show at Firstdraft, Milsom’s used a multiple approach to laying out the equally-sized images end to end as a continuous line around the walls. But where the experiment at Firstdraft didn’t really work, the collection of images that Milsom has painted here, from self portraits to images of weird and anonymous ‘70s people and Charles Bronson look-a-likes, the paintings are eerie and as silent as the tomb. Maybe it’s all the black he’s used?

Living On Luck is a two-fer show, a dialogue between two artists – Milsom the painter, and Hanrahan, a guy who does a lot of things. Hanrahan is a former student at the National Art School, the publicity is at pains to point out, as if this scruffy contemporary artist may embarrass and frighten the venerable school’s more conservative staff or students. One can only imagine what his former NAS lecturers would have had to say about the things he got up to at Gallery Wren, smashing holes in walls, jumping into swimming pools, playing the intro to the theme from Hogan’s Heroes on the kazoo.

The NAS staff shouldn’t have worried as Hanrahan’s work has never really strayed far from classic sculpture ideas – form, space, material. It’s true, Hanrahan also lays the soft velvet of self portraiture over the top of the objects, but if you just walk around and luxuriate in the artist’s love of wood, there’s enough aesthetic and intellectual egg nog to keep you going all day long.

For Living On Luck
Hanrahan has tapped into the a la mode style for constructing a little house in the middle of a bigger space, but he's built a shack in which one might view the artist singing country and western songs, drawings tacked up on the walls, the whole deal surrounded by smaller sculptures rather like stretchers propped up on lighting fixtures. It may well be al la mode, but it works. Harahan’s love of the absurdity of language frames the discourse, substituting song lyrics and Hank Williams crooning for confessional. We have always been attracted to the way Harahan uses objects as language, the use of text, writing and drawing finding parallels in the objects themselves, as though the three-dimensional pieces were derived from Pictionary clues.

This show is promoted as a dialogue between the artists, an exhibition that “examines conventions of portraiture and considers the complex mechanisms through which our personal and public identities [are] constructed.” We’re not sure if this show really does that, but what we can definitely vouch for is it demonstrates the way seemingly opposite practices are complimentary. Not only that but out there, beyond the high walls of any given educational institution, the borders between practices start to dissolve seconds after graduation.

Labels: , ,

Shit Hot or Not

The recent exhibition of new work by Halinka Orszulok and Rachel Scott at MOP was shit hot. While not curated as a joint show, these concurrent exhibitions both utilised suburbia as a literal and metaphorical site for investigating what is common to individual subjective experience.

To my mind, Orszulok has produced her best group of works in this series Melrose Park, seven paintings depicting scenes from the suburb she grew up in. Her remarkable competence with traditional representational technique allows her to produce photo realistic paintings which evoke intense sense memories, not just of her experience, but of our own.


Halinka Orszulok, Melrose Park, 2007.


Orszulok’s suburbia is both personal and generic then. The homes, the streets, and the park lands that surround them are purposefully undistinguished, reminding us of the way in which our relationship to the spaces we inhabit is always, already mediated by our experiences of them. It is representative of a space in which conventional dichotomies break down and are in a constant state of renegotiation: private versus public, safety versus danger, home versus displacement. And perhaps the creepiest of all: fantasy versus reality.

Orszulok’s depiction of these spaces at night, concealed and revealed through the play of light and dark, is not accidental in relation to her preoccupation with the uncanny. The scenes she paints are of places filled with anxious anticipation. For example, a picture of a girl’s toilet block draws our attention to the ambiguity of its signification. This is just a fancy way of saying that one person’s nostalgia for smoking menthol cigarettes is another’s fear of a random act of violence.

Look inside one of Oszulok’s bedroom windows and you may just find someone like Rachel Scott making art.



Scott’s (Don’t) Beat Yourself Up Over It featured framed, original poems written by her as a teenager in the late 80s and a video depicting a long session of self-flagellation with rose stems in her suburban bedroom, set to a Robbie Williams smash hit.

In this exhibition Scott puts her money where her mouth is in relation to her general project of articulating an aesthetics of the psychology of ‘failure, longing, human weakness and self-consciousness’. The poems are cringe worthy, adolescent attempts at profundity – ‘A nothing, a nobody/But somebody deep inside’ - the video as dramatic as the inane arguments over the car keys one imagines have been taking place for years in the generic lounge room beyond: I Just Want To Feel Real Love, just like you Robbie, just like all of us.

Scott’s work, both as an act of art and life, pricks the pretension of Nietzsche’s beautiful idea that pain does not necessarily make one a better human being but certainly a more profound one. Maybe that’s OK for the Germans, she seems to be saying, but some of us grew up in Crows Nest.

This is not to undermine the seriousness of Scott as an artist. She deals with some big ideas, with modesty and humour. For instance, these latest works give lie to received ideas about art as a mode of self-expression: it is not simply the externalization of the creative individual’s innate psychological states and feelings but rather a performative act constitutive of the subject-as-artist (or poet, or love interest, etc). By exposing the amateur aspects of the performance of her own psychodrama she allows us to see, in a more general way, how our often pretentious aspirations to overcome the chronic mediocrity of day-to-day existence congeal, over time, into something perhaps equally mundane. Existential alienation as a lifestyle concept.

Carrie Lumby

Labels: , ,

Venice Biennale Hee-Haw

Monday, July 16, 2007


Complete the following sentence and win a prize: "I enjoyed The Venice Biennale documentary that screened on the ABC on Tuesday July 17 because..."

Labels: ,

True or False?

Tuesday, July 10, 2007
With these 50 scientifically tested and proven questions, we can now offer free personality assessments for all of our readers who leave comments, and answer that vexing question - "What sort of an Art Life reader am I?"

Each question has one of two answers - TRUE or FALSE. Simply record your answers and send them to us at the usual email address [at right]. Please allow ten working days for a reply.


1. I have not seen a car in the past ten years.
2. I feel sorrier for strangers than close friends.
3. I enjoy reading books of fiction.
4. Flaws in others disgust me.
5. My partner’s genitals remind me of those of an animal.
6. I am more conservative than risk taking.
7. Sometimes I get very nervous.
8. I am talkative, open and relatively easy to read.
9. I more often introduce myself to strangers than strangers introduce themselves to me.
10. I consider myself more of a doer than a thinker.
11. I like to set goals before beginning a project.
12. I like to follow schedules.
13. I am easily distracted.
14. I have had sex outdoors/in a public place/at a beauty spot.
15. I lose important things/documents.
16. I think it is OK to bend the rules to complete a task on time.
17. I enjoy long weekends.
18. I once built a model airplane that flew.
19. When I was a child, I collected stamps.
20. I like to repair mechanical things in my home.
21. I am inclined to be slow and deliberate in my actions.
22. When someone disagrees with me, I refuse to listen to his/her point of view.
23. I often buy things on impulse.
24. I often change my interests.
25. I can find the good in even the most disagreeable people.
26. Lincoln was a better president than Washington.
27. I am cautious in novel situations.
28. The thought of leaving red marks on my partner’s body makes me ill.
29. I am more irritated by desultory people than sappy people.
30. People should shift interpretive frames rather than gather more facts.
31. I prefer people to be ineffable than elite.
32. I seem to speak without thinking some times.
33. I need someone to tell me that I have done a good job in order to feel good about my work.
34. I don't think of myself as having my head "in the clouds"
35. I find it easy to put myself in someone else’s shoes.
36. I can’t stop thinking about my problems.
37. It upsets me to see someone in pain.
38. I can usually sense what someone is feeling without having to ask him/her.
39. When I’ve offended someone in the past, I could never really understand why they took it so badly.
40. When people ask me a question I find obvious, I purposely respond using words even a child can understand.
41. When I’m feeling down, I remind myself to focus on the good things in my life instead of the bad.
42. I have had sex in the bathroom of a friend/family member.
43. When I get angry I have little self control.
44. The opinions of others bore me.
45. I always try to see the other person's point of view.
46. I masturbate often, sometimes more than once a day.
47. People often invite me out to social functions such as dinners and parties.
48. My interest in politics is often confused by others as anger or resentment.
49. I cannot see "magic eye" pictures.
50. I never liked my parents.

Labels: , ,

Barney Not A Purple Dinosaur II



Matthew Barney's Cremaster III [excerpt], from YouTube.

Labels: , ,

Shame About The Boat Race

Wednesday, July 04, 2007
TRACEY MOFFATT

Portraits

+

The Beautiful Human Face
[a Tracey Moffatt and Gary Hillberg video collaboration]

PRIVATE VIEW THURSDAY 5 JULY, 6-8PM
Exhibition dates: 5 July– 28 July 2007
8 Soudan Lane (off Hampden St) Paddington NSW 2021 Sydney Australia



Tracey Moffatt, Lloyd Moffatt is my brother from Brisbane, 2007.
From the series Portraits.
Archival ink on rag paper, 73.5 x 53.5 cm


Lately I’ve been making portraits I really like making them and I want them to be my on going project for a while.

So far I’ve been photographing people who cross my path from the art, fashion, entertainment, business and political worlds, as well as family and friends or whom ever I think is very original and great looking. Except this will be a problem and my portrait project will never finish because I think everyone has the potential to be great looking!

The twelve people I show here are open human beings; look at how they are all smiling up a storm. These people are all laughing at my jokes. Sometimes I had to work hard and crack jokes to get them to smile. These portraits are in a way a mirror of myself, because the gleam in the eye you see here is my gleam reflected back at me.

I shot the portraits paparazzi style straight on with a simple digital flash camera at art exhibition openings, book launches, fashion shows and glamorous parties in New York, London, Milan, Sydney and Melbourne, oh and on the Sunshine beach Australia (my brother Lloyd), throughout 2006-2007. The idea was to capture people at their very best, at public events. At parties everyone’s energy is high and everyone is dressed up and polished and willing to pose. One afternoon I did try to photograph some people in my cramped New York loft, but afternoon is when I get the usual artist’s (women’s) low energy depression and yearn for chocolate. These stilted afternoon portraits shot in natural light turned out lousy and it wasn’t because of my willing subjects but because of ME. To shoot such luminous portraits I need the buzz of a social event around me. I mysteriously pick up on the buzz and transfer my energy to the subject. It is really very interesting.

I’ve cropped the face showing only three quarters of it, not the full face. I’ve discovered that this three quarter cropping is in fact everyone’s most flattering angle. I’ve tilted everyone to the right and it’s as if they are peeking playfully around a doorway at me. In some cases I played God and switched people’s sides. For example if a person’s happiest side turned out to be their left side I digitally flipped it over to the right side and used it. Who is to notice this? The great mystery of the human face is that when we beam unselfconsciously one side is in fact happier than the other. Our faces are not symmetrical, one eye is larger than the other, our hair is thinner on one side than the other, and our mouth can change dramatically from one side to the other.

On the computer I added bright coloured paint splatters in the background because I wanted the visual feel to be like when one of those confetti guns go off at a party. For each person I tested out various coloured backgrounds and strangely only one colour seemed to sit with each person. For example a red background just didn’t work for my Sydney art dealer Roslyn Oxley, because of her fair skin but instead turquoise blue like her eyes helped to anchor the picture. I can’t wait to make more portraits and to continue my journey into the mysteries of the beautiful human face.

Tracey Moffatt, 2007


DOOMED


Tracey Moffatt’s video collage, Doomed, features depictions of doom and destruction – war, violence and terror – as they appear in cinema, one of our entertainment options. In collaboration with Gary Hillberg, with whom she made Love (2003), Artist (2000) and Lip (1999), Doomed comprises cut-and paste editing techniques in a highly entertaining and black-humorous take on the bleak side of our current psychological landscape. Moffatt’s film looks at both entirely fictional and reconstructed disastrous events. Each scene carries a particular cargo of references. They occupy their own unique symbolism and filmic territory – the poignant, sublime and epic, the tragic, the B-grade and downright trashy. The accumulation of scenes, however, within Moffatt’s own essaying, creates a narrative whole comprised of parts. Not only does Moffatt play within the ‘disaster’ genre, re-presenting representations, she revels in it. Moffatt points at how the viewer is involved in filmic narratives through the emotionally hook, by the promise of imminent disaster, an important narrative device.

Moffatt’s film itself is crafted with introduction, body, finale – a presentation of the form of filmic entertainment, as well as ‘art as entertainment’. The soundtrack builds and peaks – emotive, and a central device in journeying through sequence to climactic effect. Music manipulates, and is itself thoroughly entertaining. It is important that the title ‘Doomed’ has the quality of the not yet destroyed. It is a description that is applied on individuals, families, lovers, politics, and nations – an observation made from the outside and yet containing the possibility (read hope) that situations can be salvaged.

Naomi Evans, 2007

Tracey Moffatt is one of Australia’s leading contemporary artists as well as being an artist of international significance. Since her first solo exhibition in Sydney in 1989, she has had numerous solo exhibitions in major museums around the world. Working in photography, film and video, Moffatt first gained significant critical acclaim when her short film Night Cries was selected for official competition at the 1990 Cannes Film Festival. Her first feature film, beDevil, was also selected for Cannes in 1993. In 1997, she was invited to exhibit in the Aperto section of the Venice Biennale. A major exhibition of Moffatt’s work was held at the Dia Center for the Arts in New York in 1997/98 which consolidated her international reputation. Recently, comprehensive survey exhibitions of Moffatt’s work have been held at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney and the Hasselblad Centre in Goteburg, Sweden. A new monograph, ‘The Moving Images of Tracey Moffatt’ by Dr Catherine Summerhayes, is soon to be published by Charter Publishers, Milan.

Tracey Moffatt was recently the recipient of the 2007 Infinity Award for art by the International Center of Photography, New York. Infinity Awards are given for outstanding achievements in photography by honoring individuals with distinguished careers in the field and by identifying future luminaries.

Labels: , , ,

Abe Never Freed The Slaves

Tuesday, July 03, 2007


From C.S.A. - The Confederate States of America, clip from YouTube

Labels: ,