<body><style type="text/css"> #header { padding: 0; margin: 0; position: relative; height: 100px; background: #FFFFFF; border-bottom: 1px solid #0074C4; font: 11px 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; /* Resets 1em to 10px */ color: #444; } ul.menu { margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; bottom: 0; left: 20px; width: 90%; } ul.menu li { display: inline; margin: 0; } ul.menu, ul.menu li a { padding: 5px 15px 6px; } ul.menu li a { font-size: 1em; color: white; margin: 0; background: #000000; text-decoration: none; } ul.menu li a:hover { background: #0074C4; color: white !important; text-decoration: none; } ul.menu li.current_page_item a, ul.menu li.current_page_item a:hover { color: #FFFFFF !important; background: #0074C4; text-decoration: none; } </style> <form action="../../../../../../../cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000110A/x-proxy/start" method="post" target="_top"> <!-- Begin Publisher Code --> <script src="../../../../../../../publisherJS.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> initAdversal("b120075ce62dd78b6155ae4282225e28", true); </script> <!-- End Publisher Code --> <div id="header"> <ul class="menu"> <li class="current_page_item"><a href="http://www.allgeeks.info/" title="Blog">Blog</a></li> <li class="page_item">Myspace Train of Password stealers</li> <li class="page_item">Unblock Myspace Everywhere</li></ul> </div> <center> Location&nbsp;via&nbsp;proxy:<input name="URL" size="66" value="http://artlife.blogspot.com/search/label/poll"><input type="submit" value="Go"> &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="/" target="_top">[&nbsp;UP&nbsp;]</a> &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="/" target="_top">[Manage&nbsp;cookies]</a> <hr> </center> </form> <iframe width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="../../../../../../../files/_blogspot_com_search_70xzbd7k8kktxzoy8szynq" id="navbar-iframe" height="30px" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>

the art life

"...it's just like saying 'the good life'".

There's still time...

Thursday, November 08, 2007
... to vote in our "most influential commercial contemporary art gallery" poll. Current voting puts Gallery Barry Keldoulis in an almost unbeatable lead with 79 votes, Roslyn Oxley 9 Gallery second with 65 votes and at the tail end of the field Tim Olsen Gallery, Liverpool Street Gallery and King Street Gallery are looking for more friends. For those wondering how to rort the system, you can vote every day until the close of voting at 5pm on Friday.

Slight Correction: It was pointed out to us that Mori Gallery is missing from the poll. There's no conspiracy there, we just forgot. We had thought of doing a round-up poll for second place, something like "what's better than a pork chop - Mori Gallery or apple sauce?" but decided against it. Let's just say Mori Gallery got five votes and apple sauce is just as popular as ever.

Labels:

2007 Beyond Thunderdome

Monday, October 29, 2007


It's that time of year again, end-of-year best-of's and meaningless lists... And we love 'em. The Art Life was recently asked to contribute to a glossy magazine ranking celebrities in the art world. Unfortunately, our nominations didn't make the cut, but it got us thinking that it was high time we threw down the gauntlet, opened up the floodgates, mixed our metaphors and came up with a list of our own. From here until the end of the year we're asking you, the discerning readers of this blog, to help create the ultimate art world thunderdome - most influential galleries, best shows, highest hijinks... Two artists enter, one artist leaves... Vote as you see fit [at right]

[If you're viewing this post via email, click here to vote...]

Labels:

Democratic Art Life

Tuesday, September 11, 2007
They say the only poll that matters is the one on election day. That may be true for electing governments, but it's cold comfort for an art world where elections are never held and the people in charge step down only when they feel like it or die [whichever comes first].

That's where The Art Life comes in - as we've said in the past, we're the only participatory democracy on the web. For the last three and a half years we've been putting up polls asking what you, the punters of the art world, truly believe. The answers have been an illuminating insight into the fetid recesses of your dark psyches and as mysterious as a 18 point poll lead in a never-ending Federal Election. After all this time, what can we say about the average Art Life poll respondent?


Any time now...

Well, we can say that 39 percent of Art Life readers like libraries "because that's where all the books are" while 23 percent think a stack of books is a "good place for a wank". You were unimpressed with The National Art School's open letter to [soon to be possibly former] Prime Minister John Howard, believing it was already a lost cause, 34 percent asking "hasn't that place closed already?" while 38 percent agree that living icon Robert Hughes is "some old guy who lives in New York."

But on to more important matters - such as art. Art Life readers like a conceptual challenge, such as ruminating on the relationship between art & design:


Design is to art as

Utility is to concept 8%
Looking good is to feeling good 28%
A tea pot is to an art museum 10%
Shopping at DJs is to buying art supplies 20%
Smooth and frictionless is to sharp and pointy 9%
Number one is to number two 25%


...or the philosophical implications of naming an object a "painting":

A painting is...

Hangs on a wall, is blue 2%
A square or rectangle covered in pigment 8%
Any shape or size, with or without pigment 8%
A sculpture, film or hook rug 9%
A sound investement 9%
A thing that collects dust on the top edge 13%
Whatever I say it is dammit 53%


...or working out how to solve the never-ending crisis in art school funding:

The answer to the art school funding crisis is

Close 'em down now and let God sort it out 9%
Amalgamate all art schools into one huge institution 2%
Provide the Universities with realistic funding levels 34%
Hand over tertiary education to the private sector 2%
Make the courses more attractive to students 3%
Make the students more attractive to staff 16%
Whinge and moan about being "special" then die 17%
Forget about education altogther and just dance 17%


Art Life readers are typically unimpressed with art world icons. Not only did Robert Hughes score poorly, so did Brett Whiteley. When we asked you to consider the legacy of Whiteley it was a dead heat in the voting between celebrating his genius ["a great Australian painter" - 33 percent] and driving a stake through his heart ["dear god, won't someone let him die?" - 33 percent].

You don't have much time for glamorous art exhibitions either. What did you think of The Venice Biennale for 2007? You simply refused to answer the question with 32 percent declaring "you people make me sick." [In the same poll, 18 percent accurately described the Biennale as being a "big exhibition held every two years' while 28 percent spitefully noticed the city is "slowly sinking into the sea"]. At the other end of the scale, local shows such as the annual Sculpture By The Sea gets short shrift:

Sculpture By The Sea...

Highly valued focus for sculpture practice 3%
One-in-all-in sculpture prize fiesta 6%
A pleasant walk by the ocean on a sunny day 14%
Should be "Sculpture In the Sea" 15%
One piece of crap after another 27%
Three dimensional version of the Archibald Salon des Refuses 14%
A serious interruption to South Head cottaging 5%
Where's the big tank? 15%


Art Life readers are a self-absorbed lot, likely to become morose by seeking solace in the bottle [25 percent opting to "drown my sorrows" if their gallery was to close, leaving them unrepresented] or lashing out unexpectedly, 36 percent believing that they weren't going anywhere ["I aint going nowhere b-aitch".] But what of people who work in galleries? Two recent polls proved revealing. People working in commercial galleries don't want to be there:

Working at a commercial art gallery I...

Answer phones, organise shows 4%
Build my knowledge of the art biz 7%
Loiter in the stock room, smoke 9%
Flip through mags, ignore visitors 16%
Waste time surfing the net, playing Warcraft 15%
Dress like my boss coz they make me 15%
Apply for jobs in public art museums 18%
Have little interest in art 15%


...and people working in artist-run galleries shouldn't be there either:

Working at an artist run gallery I...

Just popped out for 15 minutes 16%
Will eventually pass on phone messages 1%
Charge 33 percent for just being here 9%
Don't own a plasma screen TV 4%
Have no public liability insurance 10%
Have an e-mailing list swiped from another gallery 17%
Where's the electricity actually coming from??? 7%
Charge $1 extra for beers to cover costs 11%
See the potential that this place could be so much more 6%
Don't actually work here, I'm the artist 19%


So who is running the art world then? Our most recent poll reveals that Art Life readers are people with time on their hands, follow direction from their superiors well, and are loyal to their institutions. Yes, we can now reveal that The Art Gallery of NSW is the "best" art museum in the country, with a very close second place for The Australian Reptile Park - which is amazing considering the road washed at out at Sommersby and the only way you could possibly get into the Reptile Park is by climbing over dangerous fences and breaking in. But as a reader known only as Michael observed "The responses to the question of which is the best art museum in Australia might be construed as partisan or perhaps linked to where most respondents live and the number of reptiles in the art world..."

Best art museum in the country?

Art Gallery of NSW 29%
Museum of Contemporary Art 17%
National Gallery of Australia 5%
National Gallery of Victoria 11%
Gallery of Modern Art 8%
Art Gallery of South Australia 2%
Art Gallery of Western Australia 2%
Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallery 4%
Museum & Art Gallery of the NT 1%
Australian Reptile Park 22%

Labels: ,

True or False?

Tuesday, July 10, 2007
With these 50 scientifically tested and proven questions, we can now offer free personality assessments for all of our readers who leave comments, and answer that vexing question - "What sort of an Art Life reader am I?"

Each question has one of two answers - TRUE or FALSE. Simply record your answers and send them to us at the usual email address [at right]. Please allow ten working days for a reply.


1. I have not seen a car in the past ten years.
2. I feel sorrier for strangers than close friends.
3. I enjoy reading books of fiction.
4. Flaws in others disgust me.
5. My partner’s genitals remind me of those of an animal.
6. I am more conservative than risk taking.
7. Sometimes I get very nervous.
8. I am talkative, open and relatively easy to read.
9. I more often introduce myself to strangers than strangers introduce themselves to me.
10. I consider myself more of a doer than a thinker.
11. I like to set goals before beginning a project.
12. I like to follow schedules.
13. I am easily distracted.
14. I have had sex outdoors/in a public place/at a beauty spot.
15. I lose important things/documents.
16. I think it is OK to bend the rules to complete a task on time.
17. I enjoy long weekends.
18. I once built a model airplane that flew.
19. When I was a child, I collected stamps.
20. I like to repair mechanical things in my home.
21. I am inclined to be slow and deliberate in my actions.
22. When someone disagrees with me, I refuse to listen to his/her point of view.
23. I often buy things on impulse.
24. I often change my interests.
25. I can find the good in even the most disagreeable people.
26. Lincoln was a better president than Washington.
27. I am cautious in novel situations.
28. The thought of leaving red marks on my partner’s body makes me ill.
29. I am more irritated by desultory people than sappy people.
30. People should shift interpretive frames rather than gather more facts.
31. I prefer people to be ineffable than elite.
32. I seem to speak without thinking some times.
33. I need someone to tell me that I have done a good job in order to feel good about my work.
34. I don't think of myself as having my head "in the clouds"
35. I find it easy to put myself in someone else’s shoes.
36. I can’t stop thinking about my problems.
37. It upsets me to see someone in pain.
38. I can usually sense what someone is feeling without having to ask him/her.
39. When I’ve offended someone in the past, I could never really understand why they took it so badly.
40. When people ask me a question I find obvious, I purposely respond using words even a child can understand.
41. When I’m feeling down, I remind myself to focus on the good things in my life instead of the bad.
42. I have had sex in the bathroom of a friend/family member.
43. When I get angry I have little self control.
44. The opinions of others bore me.
45. I always try to see the other person's point of view.
46. I masturbate often, sometimes more than once a day.
47. People often invite me out to social functions such as dinners and parties.
48. My interest in politics is often confused by others as anger or resentment.
49. I cannot see "magic eye" pictures.
50. I never liked my parents.

Labels: , ,

Best Show of 2006 Deathmatch Results

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Download and fill in to win!





Rectangular Ghost @ Roslyn Oxley Gallery 10% 61

Del Kathryn Barton @ Kaliman Gallery 36% 216

Stars of Track & Field @ Campbelltown City Gallery 54% 324

601 votes total

Congratulations to What and fellow artists who participated in the official best show of 2006.

Labels:

Best Shows of 2006

Monday, December 11, 2006
The vote is in and we now have our Round 2 winners - the group show Stars of Track & Field at Campbelltown City Gallery and Del Kathryn Barton's show at Kaliman Gallery. They now join Rectangular Ghost in a three-cornered death match vote off. Three shows enter, only one leaves!

The Results of Round Two


Exhibitions of The Year 2.0

Stars of Track & Field @ Campbelltown Art Gallery 37% 62
From Space To Place @ Gosford Regional Gallery 1% 2
Syd Ball @ Sullivan & Strumpf 0% 0
Dashanzi Art Festival Shanghai 2% 3
Ian Milliss @ Macquaire Uni Art Gallery 15% 26
Hany Armanious @ Oxley 26% 44
Rob McLeish @ Esa Jaske 8% 14
Linda Ivimey @ Martin Browne 2% 3
Art Movement @ UTS Gallery 3% 5
Terminus 2006 5% 9

168 votes total

Analysis: The one sure thing can say about democracy is that it doesn't work. If you want something to happen you have to make it happen. Thus Stars of Track & Field streaked ahead from the start with only Hany Armanious's excellent show Intelligent Design at Oxley making any headway against the organised voting supporting the front runner. One curious aspect of this round was that the rather excellent Syd Ball show at Sullivan & Strumpf scored nul points, as the French say. You'd have thought someone would have voted for it. It might have had something to do with the show being by an old codger doing abstract paintings no one is really bothered with - but then Ian Milliss scored well with his show at Mac Uni so there's goes that reasoning. Meanwhile Art Movement at UTS Gallery scored only a few votes too and that was one of the best shows we saw all year. In a complete reversal, fans of Rob McLeish's work at Esa Jaske early in the year once agin prove that our opinion counts for little - if you like you like it!

Exhibitions of The Year 2.1

Ten[d]ancy @ Elizabeth Bay House 2% 3
Christopher Hanrahan @ MOP 19% 34
Pam Aitken @ SNO 2% 4
Stephen Birch @ Kaliman 1% 1
Tim Silver @ GrantPirrie 9% 17
Benedict Ernst @ Platform 12% 22
Hayden Fowler @ Gallery Barry Keldoulis 12% 21
ReFrame @ Ivan Dougherty Gallery 1% 2
Lionel Bawden @ GrantPirrie 2% 4
Adventures in Form and Space @ AGNSW 5% 9
Primavera @ MCA 3% 6
John Hoyland @ Michael Carr 1% 2
Singapore Biennale 0% 0
Del Kathryn Barton @ Kaliman 20% 37
Tim Storrier @ Sherman Galleries 2% 4
Noel McKenna @ Darren Knight 9% 16

182 votes total


Analysis: Unlike voting in 2.0, the 2.1 vote wasn't swayed by a voting block - the votes for Del Kathryn Barton's show were consistent and wide spread. Christopher Hanrahan's show at MOP [no "Projects" anymore and that's official]was just as good and was pipped at the final post. Hanrahan dops out of contention but can happily spend the holiday season wondering if he has or hasn't been picked up by Oxley Gallery [we asked but have yet to get an answer from the gallery itself]. One show in this section scored no votes at all - the unlovely Singapore Biennale - a well deserved ignominy. Incredibly, Tim Storrier's dog's breakfast of a show at Sherman Galleries got four votes, but we suspect, like John Hoyland's outing with Michael Carr Art Dealer, it was a guilty pleasure.

The final vote off will finish at 9.30am Tuesday December 19th and be announced on Eastside Radio 89.7FM at 10am.

Labels:

Carry Over Champs

Monday, December 04, 2006
The vote for the first part of our quest to discover what was 2006's best show came in quick and fast - especially since we encourage multiple votes. There were some strong contenders - Vicky Browne's show at Pelt, which we thought very few had seen, scored well. The fatastic City of Shadows at the Police and Justice Museum also registered a strong vote. In the end, however, it was a race between Todd McMillan and Rectangular Ghost, a group show at Oxley curated by Amanda Rowell. At the conclusion of voting this morning Rectangular Ghost was the Kevin Rudd of the art world:


Vicky Browne @ Pelt 9% 18
Cullen/Brown @ MOP 9% 17
Tim McMonagle @ Kaliman 8% 16
Paul Knight @ ACP 8% 15
McLean Edwards @ Matin Browne 2% 3
Mark Heatherington @ Ray Hughes 10% 19
Ghosts of The Coast @ 4A 4% 8
Lindy Lee @ Oxley 5% 10
Rectangular Ghost @ Oxley 16% 31
Hannah Furmage @ Artspace 3% 6
Todd McMillan @ GrantPirrie 12% 24
Zanny Begg @ Mori 3% 5
City of Shadows @ Police & Justice Museum 5% 10
Biennale of Sydney 8% 16
Louis Pratt @ Depot Gallery 1% 2

200 votes total


With Rectangular Ghost now our carry over champ from Round 1, we announce part two. This will be in two parts, leading to a three cornered vote off commencing December 11.

Questions: What? Sydney only? Actually no, as you can see from the second two polls, we've included two exhibitions Art Life covered overseas, two in regional areas. We left The Adelaide Biennial of Australian Art out of the vote mainly because we forgot about it, even though we had been there. That might seem like a strange reason, but on reflection, a very good one.

Bah humbug, there's nothing but art in commercial galleries here. We covered a lot of shows in 2006 in a variety of exhibition spaces - commercial, artist run, public, museums, regional, window spaces, even some shows staged on the street. The exhibitions we've selected - and we couldn't put up everything we covered on the blog and on the podcast - have been chosen to reflect the variety of what we've covered and the range of art out there.

Labels:

Vote Like You Mean It

Saturday, November 25, 2006
There's less than a month to go until the begining of the holiday season. In our lead up to taking a break, we're asking you to vote in our now annual poll of the best exhibitions for the year.

It's a bit like a league table - vote for the best show from the first half of the year, then we'll ask you to vote for the best show of the second half, then the two shows voted best will go into a grand finale vote-off. The winner [or winners if it's a group show] will be crowned 'best' in a special ceremony to be hosted by Edmund Capon, Elizabeth Ann Macgregor and Mikey Robbins to take place on New Year's Eve at Umina Recreation Area [just near the skate park]!!!*

The vote this year is open to abuse which means you can vote as many times as you like. You can vote once a day every day until the second part of the list goes up on December 5... [ or if you'd like to cheat, here's how: delete cookies or cached info from your web browser, then reload the page. You can then vote again.] The finalists were drawn from the exhibitions we reviewed rather than all shows that were open in 2006, which probably would have made the list too long, no?

Part 1 will be up until December 4th.

Now vote like you mean it.

[*subject to confirmation]

Labels:

Son of Site Life

Monday, August 01, 2005
People have been writing to us and some of the emails have been very nice, very polite requests for links to new blogs and sites.

Margaret Mayhew, who used to be part of 2SER’s Artichoke team before the show got the axe, wrote to let us know that she has a new exhibition coming up but she was too scared to tell us the details in case we were mean. Ms Mayhew writes:

After your roasting of Shane Hasseman’s video/felt piece I chuckled - and then saw him striding down king street (without the bag). He wasn't meeting anyone’s eye and didn't return my hello, so I'm scared of sending you details of my show which opens on Tuesday - coz not sure if the oeuvre is ready to face the slings and arrows of fate and published opinion.


What’s really disturbing about that email is that we thought we gave Hasseman’s show a pretty good write up, but now he’s a shattered figure sans bag. Mayhew did provide a link to her new blog Art & Mayhem. We wondered if it was going to be another one of those “I did a painting on Monday and it was good” artist blogs but thankfully it’s a lot more entertaining than that and so much like the art life we all know and love:


It was Friday night and I'd had two really appalling gin and tonics at manning bar. You think it would be impossible to stuff up a G&T - but some people are up to any challenge. Consequence of sipping G&T; on a wintry sunset even when crap: love of universe, open to anything…


Bob Abrahams is an artist from Western Australia who dropped us an email to say that he was impressed by our blog and maybe we’d be interested in a link to his own Visual Art Notes. Thanks to Bob.

Meanwhile, an American artist named James W. Bailey “cordially” invited us to view his blog Black Cat Bone - Burning The Flesh Off Modern Art. In his personal description Bailey says he is

...an experimental artist, photographer and imagist writer from Mississippi. His art focus includes Littoral Art Projects that explore the fleeting moments of cross-cultural communicative intersections; film projects, including the short film, "Talking Smack"; “Wind Painting”, a unique naturalistic art practice inspired by the vanishing Southern African-American cultural tradition of the Bottle Tree; street photography centered on the hidden cultural edges of inner city New Orleans life; and “Rough Edge Photography”, a hard-edge non-digital photographic style that celebrates the death of 35mm film through the burning, tearing, slashing and violent manipulation of chemically developed negatives and prints.


And what does being an ‘experimental artist’ actually mean? It means stalking women on the DC area subway system, taking photos of them [most without their knowledge] posting them on his website and then explaining how he “fell in love” with each and every one of them. We hope the experiment is a success but with such icky shades of Sin City we doubt it.

Meanwhile at The Art Life, no pictures? What’s the story? There’s what’s called a “technical problem” and we haven’t been able to fix it. This is the downside of free online blogging – like a Japanese backpacker stranded in the desert, when there’s a real problem there’s no support or if it comes it takes days to get there. If anyone knows the intricacies of FTP, Hello or Blogger photos, we’d appreciate an email to the usual address. In the meantime, it’s back to links.

Finally, last week we gazed upon the Esteemed Critic's face for hours and wondered, is that really him? The answer is YES:

Is that REALLY John McDonald?

Yes it is 63% [26]

No, but it really looks like him 37% [15]

total votes: 41

Labels: , ,

Sorry

Monday, July 25, 2005
Last week we asked readers if we owed them an apology and if so, what for. For most of the week we were smug and pleased as the NO vote easily outstripped the YES vote by a factor of 2 to 1. Late in the week we started to get worried as a surge on the YES vote eclipsed NO until today we are confronted with the truth:

The Art Life Owes Me An Apology

Yes 53% [37]

No 47% [33]

Total votes: 70

So we owe you an apology? The idea was that people write in or leave a comment and tell us just what we did to offend them but so far NOT A SINGLE REASON has been given. Not one. In that case, and based on legal advice, we have decided to express our 'regret' [insofar as an admission of fault or wrong doing may lead to many years of litigation in the High Court] and leave it at that. Go on, march across the Harbour Bridge, see how far that gets you.

Labels: ,