<body><style type="text/css"> #header { padding: 0; margin: 0; position: relative; height: 100px; background: #FFFFFF; border-bottom: 1px solid #0074C4; font: 11px 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; /* Resets 1em to 10px */ color: #444; } ul.menu { margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; bottom: 0; left: 20px; width: 90%; } ul.menu li { display: inline; margin: 0; } ul.menu, ul.menu li a { padding: 5px 15px 6px; } ul.menu li a { font-size: 1em; color: white; margin: 0; background: #000000; text-decoration: none; } ul.menu li a:hover { background: #0074C4; color: white !important; text-decoration: none; } ul.menu li.current_page_item a, ul.menu li.current_page_item a:hover { color: #FFFFFF !important; background: #0074C4; text-decoration: none; } </style> <form action="../../../../../cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000110A/x-proxy/start" method="post" target="_top"> <!-- Begin Publisher Code --> <script src="../../../../../publisherJS.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> initAdversal("b120075ce62dd78b6155ae4282225e28", true); </script> <!-- End Publisher Code --> <div id="header"> <ul class="menu"> <li class="current_page_item"><a href="http://www.allgeeks.info/" title="Blog">Blog</a></li> <li class="page_item">Myspace Train of Password stealers</li> <li class="page_item">Unblock Myspace Everywhere</li></ul> </div> <center> Location&nbsp;via&nbsp;proxy:<input name="URL" size="66" value="http://artlife.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_archive.html"><input type="submit" value="Go"> &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="../../../../../cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000110A/http/artlife.blogspot" target="_top">[&nbsp;UP&nbsp;]</a> &nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="/" target="_top">[Manage&nbsp;cookies]</a> <hr> </center> </form> <iframe width="100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="../../../../../files/_blogspot_com_search_70xzbd7k8kktxzoy8szynq" id="navbar-iframe" height="30px" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>

the art life

"...it's just like saying 'the good life'".

Refreshments! Tennis!! Azzang!!!

Friday, September 29, 2006

Click me


*


ALL THE CRITICS LOVE YOU!


Tom McMullan and Tillie Baker
Emma Ramsay and Anna John
Matthew Hopkins and Jonathan Bailey
Elizabeth Reidy and Vicki Papageorgopoulos

Daniel Green


A show that could in many ways be described as being the curatorial equivalent of an eight year old with a can of spray deodorant, wall-to-floor wardrobe mirrors and a Tiffany CAS single. ALL THE CRITICS LOVE YOU! is a warm, endearing and charming expression of well loved icons and the artists' personal recreations of them.

d/Lux Media Arts in association with Loose projects present this single channel video exhibition in which artists Tom McMullan and Tillie Baker, Emma Ramsay and Anna John, Matthew Hopkins and Jonathan Bailey, Elizabeth Reidy and Vicki Papageorgopoulos and Daniel Green honour the notion that

“imitation is the highest form of flattery”.

Exploring popular cultural moments in film, theatre, gaming, dance and music. Each respective work cheekily embraces a moment embedded in the world of iconic popular culture to re-establish it within a dialogue of celebrated mediocrity and desire.

opening wednesday 4th october 6-8pm continues to saturday 14th october

For more info contact Elizabeth Reidy [email protected] / 02 9267 4777

ALL THE CRITICS LOVE YOU! is a curatorial project proudly brought to you
by Elizabeth Reidy's network and d/Lux Media Arts.


+


ongoing in the BLACK BOX

And They Lived Happily Ever After


CHRISTOPHER BRUCE

curated by Scott Donovan Projects

Loose projects. Level 2, 168 Day St, Sydney
gallery hours. thursday and friday 12-5pm saturday 1-6pm

0417 024 957 [email protected]

Loose Projects


*



Click me



*


twentylove


Firstdraft is pleased to present the twentylove forum series, a free series of discussions open to all on Saturday afternoons throughout October. Debate issues and ideas with key identities from the Sydney arts community and beyond:


On approach
Introducing firstdraft in the wider ARI community Saturday 2-4pm October 7

Firstdraft directors past and present will launch the anniversary forum program with the ARI matchmaker publication and new website. Dr Kit Messham-Muir (Arts NSW) will open the anniversary program, and introducing our broader arts community will be ARI representatives from Sydney, interstate and New Zealand.

On showCurators, artists and the Invisible Inc speak Saturday 2-4pm October 14

Guest curators Emma White and Jessica Olivieri, exhibiting artists Michael Moran and Mitch Cairns, Iakovos Amperidis our Firstdraft studio artist and the Invisible Inc will introduce their projects over the anniversary program.

Departure Different ways of doing things Saturday 2-4pm October 21

ARIS and arts projects do not have to be tied down to the traditional model of exhibitions within a gallery space, as representatives from these innovative and fluid initiatives testify. Featuring Rachel Scott (The Invisible Inc.), Sarah Rawlings and Clare Lewis (Terminus Projects), Dougal Phillips and Oiver Watts, (½ Doz), Alex Garownski (Loose Projects) and Jeff Kahn (Next Wave Festival)

OnwardsAvenues within the contemporary arts
2-4pm October 28

Emerging artists, curators and arts workers face a wealth of possibility for making their path in the contemporary art community. Featuring Sophie O’Brien (Venice Biennale 07, Australia Council for the Arts), Reuben Keenan (Artspace), Anthony Whelen (Sherman Galleries Art Box), Soda_Jerk (collaborative artist/curator/critical team) and The Art Life (lauded Sydney art blog).

Join us in marking firstdraft’s 20 years of supporting contemporary artists, curators and discourse - come down to the gallery on your Saturday afternoons and chat with these eminent art identities about what is going on in our cultural community.

Take part in the commentary on firstdraft’s longevity, and discuss possibilities and priorities, aspirations and challenges for artists and ARIs in Sydney and further afield.

Refreshments will be served.


Firstdraft
116-118 Chalmers St, Surry Hills NSW 2010
t: +61 (0)2 9698 3665 e: [email protected]
http://www.firstdraftgallery.com/
Firstdraft opening hours: Wednesday-Saturday 12-6pm
(During twentylove - Tuesday - Sunday 12-6pm)


*


Labels: ,

Art World FAQs # 3 - Good Art

Monday, September 25, 2006
How do I know a work of art is good?

This is the most difficult question to answer because the various factors that go into considering the worth of a work of art cannot help but be subjective. Like Bad Art, Good Art has a number of individual factors that should be considered or rejected when making a judgment. But where do you start? What should you consider? It all seems so hard… Luckily, The Art Life has formulated a 10 point rating system that can be used to score a work of art. When each score for each of the 10 categories is tabulated and compared to our completely objective measure of your subjective responses, you will finally, once-and-for-all be able to confidently say “this is a good work of art.”

1. I know I like it…

Just because you like something doesn’t mean its any good – yet you know you like it. Somewhere in the back of your mind, however, you know the art work is probably crap, it may not be very well done, or be visually appealing, it might be on sale for $2 and they might be everywhere - and no one else is likely to appreciate it on your level - but despite all this, you still like it… [See also #10]
[Score __/10]

2. Other People Say It’s Good

For reasons that seem obscure to you, there are a lot of people going around saying the work of art is good. There are people in newspapers, the web, on TV and radio all agreeing. Although, to you, the work seems weightless, pointless and disposable, the conviction of other people’s opinions appears rock solid – maybe these people see something you cannot see… and maybe they’re right! [See also #4]
[Score __/10]


3. It’s Historically Relevant
The work of art was already considered good long before you were born. You grew up looking at the work of art in books and on TV and hearing a lot of very clever people explaining why the work of art is historically relevant because [etc]. Does the work actually embody some particular idea or time that has now passed? Does the work still have some relevance now? If so, score accordingly [See also #2]
[Score __/10]

4. The Work Is Relevant to Contemporary Debates

Just because something is fashionable doesn’t mean it’s therefore bad – it just means a lot of people agree about something at the same time. In this context, a work of art may be superbly illustrative of a particular view, idea, philosophy, emotion or sentiment that is a la mode. If a work of art successfully engages with debates surrounding Post Colonialism, Post Modernism, Commodity Fetishism or [fill in today’s debate] it may achieve a high score in this category. [See also #3]
[Score __/10]

5. Technically, The Work of Art Is Very Well Made


For many people, this is the beginning and end of the question of whether a work of art is any good– but taken alone this category only proves that the artist has craft skills and little else. A subjective value judgment of whether something is well made usually also leads to the presumption that it looks good too – but that isn’t always the case. Asking if something is well made will perhaps also suggest that it will last through the ages [See #3] but might mean the work in question is a painting or a sculpture. But what if the work is an example of Land Art, or an ‘action’, or some other fast fading, temporary installation? The question then is about the appropriateness of a particular technique… [See also #6]
[Score __/10]

6. The Work Is Visually Appealing

When a work of art is visually appealing it is because you like its deployment of individual characteristics – but that doesn’t mean the work is pretty. In fact, it might be downright fugly, yet the artist made deliberate choices that the work should look the way it does. And it looks good! [See also #4]
[Score __/10]

7. The Work is Now an Icon

Like it or loathe it, the work of art has now reached complete ubiquity. Whether it has been around for yonks [See #3] or just arrived [See #4] makes little difference to the fact that you cannot escape it – in fact, the work of art’s ubiquity will now also mean it is historically relevant and will encourage contemporary debate. On the other hand, the work’s ubiquity might also be a pleasurable experience – make you laugh, make you cry, make you kiss $10 museum entry goodbye! [See also #8]
[Score __/10]

8. It Is Extremely Rare

There was only one. They found one in a very remote place. The person who made it is now dead. It is extremely expensive and/or hard to make. It is made from unusual materials that won’t last [except under special lighting]. Although once common, it is now kept in a safe and people are only allowed to look at it on special occasions. It was made a very long time ago. It was made for a different purpose but people now appreciate it on aesthetic grounds. [See also #7 #5 and #3]
[Score __/10]

9. The Work Of Art Is Worth A Lot of Money

There are people in the world who are prepared to pay extraordinary amounts of money for a work of art. All of the other categories come into play here and inevitably add more weight to other considerations when cold hard cash is on the table… I like it, but does anyone else? [#1]. If I pay big bucks, is it going to last? [#5] Is it beautiful to me? [#6] Is the work backed up by opinion and scholarly learning? [#2, #3, #4] You say no one else owns it - and it’s the only one of its kind?!! [#7, #8] Do you accept MasterCard, Diners or American Express? Kaaaa-chhing!
[Score __/10]

10. You Feel Something When You Look at It

Of all the imponderables of good art, this is the most perplexing, allusive and troubling – the work of art provokes an actual emotive response when you look at it – and strangest of all – it may not be the same response twice… What’s going on here? Why am I feeling this way? And how could this thing make me feel anything?!!
[Score __/10]

Just How Good Is It?

0-15 – Not Good - The work is actually quite bad but it has qualities you like. Just don’t fork out a lot of money for it and if you do, don’t expect to ever get it back.

15-30 – Just Ok - A lot of people like it and it seems ok – so it probably is ok. Most likely you will find this work in ok galleries done by ok artists and maybe in ok biennales. There is a lot of ok art.

30-60 – Average – it probably won’t last [in any sense] but it’ll do for now. It adequately fulfills a lot of requirements and is often mistaken for the next level of excellence, but it also has a level of durability and is probably aesthetically pleasing [in this year’s colours]. Enjoy while you can.

60-75 – Above Average – Not very much of this art actually exists and, in a rush of excitement, can get confused for art in the 75-100 range. Above Average art is usually made by mid to late career artists with a handle on what they are doing and, crucially, what they mean to do.

75-97 – Very Good Indeed – Any half decent public museum or [more likely] private or corporate collection will have a lot of very good art since they are the ones with the money to afford it. Since an inverse ratio applies here, very good art is often disliked for many spurious reasons. However, it is still very good indeed.

97-100 – A Masterpiece – Rarely if ever encountered, the “masterpiece” may be an illusion, but like heaven and the afterlife, a nice idea to cling to if most art scores in the 15 to 50 range. Rarely, consensus agrees that a work of art truly is a masterpiece and then we may all bask in its warmly glowing warm glow.

Labels: , ,

Beard Club For Men

Thursday, September 21, 2006
Out on the balcony the word is that the show inside is ‘lo-fi. It’s the mantra we hear all night - lo-fi, lo-fi, lo-fi…Everyone is there, it’s packed, the drink is flowing. It’s the kids Biennale that’s on every year – Primavera 06 Exhibition by Young Australian Artists. Very few seem to have actually seen the art in the show saying with half serious promises that they’ll come back later for a “proper look.” The opening shindig is sponsored by Deutsche Bank and now, finally free of having to “thank Telstra” every time someone at the Museum of Contemporary Art opens an envelope, the crowd is effing and blinding like there’s no tomorrow.




We look around – people are in high spirits. There’s the Expat Artist back for a few weeks to take care of business. There’s the Young Bearded Painter who somehow snuck in without a ticket. The Man In The Black Hat looks like a fella with murder on his mind, itchin’ to get a few like it’s nickel night at the cat house. The Well Known Academic is wearing his pyjamas and a woman in a fox stole who looks just like Margaret Dumont cuts a path through the crowd. The Cool Kids are all there too looking, well, cool, smoking. As Salvador Dali said, the only thing wrong with young people today is that one is no longer part of it. We down a few more beers while listening to some guy saying what he’d do if he had curated Primavera. At that very moment the real curator Aaron Seeto comes by wearing a crumpled suit giving him the look of a man who has slept cramped in Economy all the way from New York ….

Seeto’s laudable idea for Primavera 06 was to eschew the thematic as the organising principle for his selection of artists and their work. It’s an idea that’s gathering a lot of momentum in the art world, sick as we are of the absurdly obvious or, on the other hand, the vague, what’s-the-idea-again-? curated shows that are more about the big idea than actually discovering what artists are doing, on their terms, and then putting it all together in a logical, credible way. Remember how people used to say that comedy was the new rock and roll? Well, curators are the new stand up comedians – have you heard the one about the artist who wanted to question notions of authenticity while simultaneously problematising the dematerialisation of the art object in light of relational aesthetics and concepts of locality and community? So we were excited to hear that Seeto had torn up the rule book and travelled around Australia without a big thematic concept in mind. He says as much in the Primavera catalogue that he visited artists in their studios and let his own taste and interests be his guide. Beaudy.

That was the theory anyway. No theme. But then, reading the essay, Seeto attempts to find some connections between the artists, wondering if the ‘programmatic treatment’ he created for himself didn’t contain hidden commonalities. They do, and that’s why the 13 artists in the show make work that looks like it could have all been quite plausibly made by the one person. Seeto is also keen to deny a greater narrative at work in Primavera than mere coincidence and parallel and yet as the work is laid out in the MCA, there is a narrative. The work in Primavera presents a through line of consistent interests, an attitude of make-do-ness, a generational world view which values self effacing expressionism over demonstrative show off skills. It’s lo-fi all the way.


David Griggs, Renewing The Spirit [detail], 2006.
Acylic and collage on canvas with wall painting, 10 paintings each 180x180cms.
Courtesy the artist, Uplands Gallery, Melbourne, and Kaliman Gallery, Sydney.


Well, not quite all the way. The show starts – or finishes depending on where you look first – with a huge, 10 painting installation wall work by David Griggs. The massive piece is called Renewing The Spirit and like his recent installation at the Art Gallery of NSW, it’s big and colourful stuff. Piling up images on canvas, the stretchers are mounted over giant cut-out donuts which are in turn mounted on the gallery wall which has been painted sky blue. The doorway is festooned with a lace curtain giving the MCA the feel of a Thai nightclub. Like the tattoos and wall paintings of Asia from which much of Griggs’s images seem to be derived, they are instantaneously appealing with lots of black and white key lines and solid areas of bright colour to draw the eye. But does your eye stay there? We kept looking away and then looking back, hoping for more, yet becoming distracted again and wandering off. Griggs’s work, for all its visual chutzpah is very polite and we keep wondering if keeping so in check is a deliberate ploy. Whatever our reservations, compared to the rest of the show Griggs’s work feels like its on steroids.


Peter McKay, Save Yourself, 2006.
Type C photograph, 76x82cms.
Courtesy the artist.


Peter McKay’s series of photos on the next wall seem like they might be shots of distant galaxies but a sandshoe seen in the bottom corner of one gives the game away – they are photos of glitter sprinkled on footpaths. They are very pretty images and give some hope to those who thought that seeing stars from the gutter was only the preserve of those lucky enough to land on their backs – now if you fall face down you’ll get just as nice a view. A second series of images seem incredibly reminiscent of Chris Offili’s elephant turd sculptures complete with glitter and text – SAVE YOURSELF says one, KEEP BREATHING says another. But it turns out they are potatoes, a vegetable that the artist claims has ‘personality’, and they have something to say to us.

The middle of the room is taken up with Christian de Vietri’s sculptures. Six Degrees of Separation is a sad line of diminishing velvet rope, as though the sculpture is leading red carpet celebrities into the ground. Facing the work is a series of three sculptures – figures standing on plinths, one each in marble, gold leaf and aluminum. The last one, the aluminum man, is one of those people who do the slo-mo “am I a statue?” thing in Pitt Street Mall and Circular Quay. His companions are more formal – one quasi Egyptian the other quasi Greek. In this series de Vietri seems to be asking us to consider the deformation of classical forms into contemporary vernacular while the former piece is a reversal where a contemporary object is given a contemporary art inversion. It works well, it’s very nicely done and it’s really boring.


Rob McHaffie, Woody and Soon-yi [detail] 2006.
Oil on linen, 2 panles each 28x25cms.
Courtesy the artist and Darren Knight Gallery, Sydney.


Around the corner in the next room the work of Rob McHaffie and SimonYates share the space. McHaffie, who shows with Darren Knight Gallery, does precise small scale oil on linen paintings of stuff. Some of it is an obvious gag – a painting of Woody Allen and Soon-yi reduces their faces to hi-lariously appropriate objects while others are more obscure - one work has a banana peel and a crushed drink can in it. McHaffie’s art is where domestic digital non-art photography meets oil painting and if you can imagine Michael Zavros giving up painting horses for a Coles tidy bag, then you can get where McHaffie is at. Yates meanwhile exhibits in artist run galleries. We saw his robot man at Firstdraft and version 2.0 is installed in Primavera. Along with the balloon aided man is a couple of works on plinths of Yates’s designs for time machine and a “duplicator”. Yates is one of the few artists in Primavera who seems not to be trying too hard to be eccentric – the work really is idiosyncratic, following what appears to be a very genuine interest in made up science. The production qualities are hand made and the accompanying texts contradictory and slightly confusing. But you hardly care - sincerity is such an undervalued virtue these days.

In the catalogue interview with artist team Wilkins Hill, Seeto comments that their surnames sound like brand or a company. It does and their work – The Danger of Inheritance – looks like it’s been made by a providore of bespoke sculptural objects. Please consider the following: a steel frame sculpture like a small fence in sections; drawings of Bart Simpson as he appeared on the Tracey Ullman Show; two video screens showing an image of a spa bath being filled in bathroom with a view out to a garden: a text about Intelligent Design that argues that, despite claims to the truth of the theory of evolution, the speaker knows that Intelligent Design is proof of a creator with a master plan. There is very little in this work that makes us want to consider its hidden meanings much further than a cursory glance over its surfaces. Perhaps the logic leaps and image associations are what it’s meant to be about but it’s very hard to say and frankly, not very interesting - the work is too convoluted and willfully obscure and offers little reward for an idea that Hany Armanious does so much better.


Chayni Henry, Dead Franck, 2004.
Acylic on board, 41x27cms.
Courtesy the artist.


The 20 panel series of paintings by Chayni Henry was the hit of the opening with a long line of punters standing shoulder to shoulder reading the texts. Reminiscent of naïve paintings done for the healing power of Saints, Henry’s works are stories of everyday encounters. Some, like a tale of being nearly stranded in a national park, are what you might call quotidian-poetic while others – about lost pets and St. Francis and the Virgin of Tiwi - go for more ironic-spiritual. The works share the space with Wilkins Hill’s sculpture and it’s like putting a cuckoo clock next to a Porsche. The next room doesn’t have nearly as big a contrast, the works more or less running into each other. Benjamin Armstrong’s work channels the spirit of Sarah Lucas, limp leg like things sticking out of glass funnels reminiscent of your mum’s old vases with the odd candle holder. The sequence of sculptures is set next to Katherine Huang’s a seemingly haphazard collection of objects arranged on wooden shelves that reveal themselves to be the result of a careful plan. The aesthetic is wood a la Ikea and fits in well with Armstrong’s conversation-starter vases, but it would be surprising if they were in stock – all the good stuff in the catalogue is always an obligatory six week wait once you order them.


Katherine Huang, Untitled, 2006.
Mixed media installation, dimesions variable.
Courtesy the artist.


The mezzanine section of the MCA and the last bit of Primavera starts with Fergus Binns’s Unattended Baggage an unattended bag waiting for security to come along and blow it up. In the “post 9/11 world™” unattended baggage is to the public space as the garbage bin was once post Hilton bombing – a threatening potential. In the case of Binns’s the bag looks like it’s full of dirty socks. Binns is the king of lo-fi guy art – ironic, crappy, boozy, piss poor, Aussie. Lots of paintings, stuff laid out on the floor, more really bad paintings of really bad stuff – VB cans, a snake, the outback, builder’s crack, a painting of Steve Irwin. We know what this work is and we have to say we don’t care. We know Australia is a disgrace, but either make us laugh or let us fucking leave. An interesting contrast is the work of Koji RyuiNocturnal Emissions – Techno Homo – a fantasy landscape constructed entirely of packing foam. Like Wilkins Hill's piece, Nocturnal Emissions is impenetrable but it doesn’t matter. It looks beautiful.


Julia de Ville, Bird Skull Brooch, 2004.
Bird skull, cubic zirconias, sterling silver, 5x2.5x3 cms.
Courtesy the artist.


The final room is a damp squib that ends with a turd in a bucket. Nature is a big subject for artists at the moment - exhibitions, monographs, big tomes in the MCA bookshop. Julia deVille makes jewellery and trophies from animals – mice and skunks and bird heads – and we’re guessing 'problematises' our relationship with luxury items and nature. We haven’t been past Fairfax & Roberts lately but we’re guessing ladies who lunch might think twice about sticking a bird skull on their wizened breasts. Elsewhere a mouse has been mounted trophy style. Matthew Griffin’s work is the end of the show, the last thing you see before you retrace your steps. It’s big and elaborate and starts with a tribute to a truly great movie Caddyshack and its immortal moment of a pot addled Bill Murray fishing a Pollywaffle out of a swimming pool. Griffin’s Caddyshacklemenot is a Polywaffle in a bucket, not quite the same as the movie, but, huh, funny man. The rest of the installation is a great example of the a la mode School of Depleted Aesthetics as pioneered by the alumni of Melbourne’s Uplands Gallery. Scarecrow like man stuck against the wall, some text on the wall, lots of straws, fairy floss. It all works in a way, but not in a way that really keeps you looking.

Primavera [we had always thought] had started as a prize and ended up as a survey. Not so. It was always just meant to be a showcase of young artists work. Like many annual shows it is warped and distorted by the changing fashions and moods of the people who run it and the people who curate it. It’s foolish to be always wanting things to be different from the way they always seem to turn out to be, but one thing we know which is possible is focus. Getting it just right is hard. At least an art prize gives an exhibition some focus. The ersatz “winner’ of Primavera wasn’t actually anyone in this year’s line up. Fiona Lowry, who was in the 05 show, was selected for the Colex Acquisitive Prize, a $20,000 purchase of work of art by a past participant in Primavera. Lowry went on to also win the staff voted award over at the ABN Amro gig which is another $2000 and a ‘round the world airline ticket. Not a bad week.


Here's some cash - now git! Todd McMillan [center] receives the scholarship from Lindy Lee.
Artspace director Blair French [right] looks on. Photo courtesy Artspace.


It’s the season for prizes. Trent Parke won the main ABN Amro prize of $10,000 although he doesn’t get an airline ticket he could certainly afford one. Samuel Wade has just today been announced the winner of the $25,000 Brett Whiteley Travelling Art Scholarship while Fiona Lowry’s stable mate Jess McNeil has won Sydney College of the Art’s Fuavette Loureiro Memorial Travel Scholarship, a cool $28,000 awarded to college alumni. Although such a nice chunk of change would get you a long way it doesn’t quite compare to the grandmummy of all the traveling art scholarships – the Helen Lempriere Travelling Art Scholarship now worth a very tasty $40,000. It says in the competition fine print that you’re supposed to go overseas and study and do something or you can just doss around in Denmark. And that’s exactly what this year’s winner Todd McMillan proposes to do.


Todd McMillan, from the series Alone, Alone, 2005-06.
C-type photographic prints on aluminium.
Courtesy the artist.



The Helen Lemp’ exhibition at Artspace is a very strong field of finalists and interestingly also offers a far more accurate overview of what’s going on in the contemporary art world than Primavera 06 or a curated show is ever likely to do. There are video artists, performance-video artists, video-sculpture artists, painting-video artists, there’s even a video-kitsch artist. A lot of the work in the Lemp will be also be familiar to anyone who regularly does the gallery art trail. There’s Pep Prodromou’s collection of spooky plastic Xmas trees The Séance from Rectangular Ghost at Roslyn Oxley, Zanny Begg’s series of placards Glass Half Full from her show at Mori, McNeil, Lowry and Chris Fox from their solo outings at Gallery Barry Keldoulis, Jaki Middleton and David Lawrey’s joyous tribute to Michael Jackson in The Sound Before You Make It from a group show at Campbelltown City Gallery and Sam Smith with and without Soda_Jerk from, well, many places. Of the works not familiar to us there were a few that really stood out.


Jaki Middleton & David Lawrey, The sound before you make it, 2005.
Mixed media, dimensions variable.
Courtesy the artists.

John A Douglas has been developing an interesting body of work that seems almost completely cut off from everything else going on in the art world. Delving into male sexuality as a subject is a thankless task – people like to know someone is doing it but would probably prefer not to have to look at it. Luckily Douglas examines his subject via movies, and not the obvious ones either. In Screen Idol [Australiana] Wake Up and Puke his conflation of Wake In Fright and Walkabout into a little kitschy thing that sits on a shelf [and includes a DVD flicking up images of Douglas losing his mind] is a very apt if obscure series of reference points. Sari TM Kivinen sits in a sink and drinks booze for a DVD work called Drunk in The Kitchen Sink Again. Lauren Brincat has a cymbals stuck to her head which she hits with drum sticks for a work called Tinnitus. Both artists deal in straight up descriptive works with straight up descriptive titles – but only one of them is in her underwear. You can choose the one you prefer.

The prize giving season is the art world's eqivalent to a family Xmas. First the presents, then the booze, then the drunken recrimnations then a long silence until next year. Part of this annual art world ritual is to celebrate the winners before turning on them like a pack of savages. Perhaps it's the knowledge that they are the ones that get to leave Australia - a country where any minute now we'll be forced to sign loyalty oaths, where everything will be owned by just one or two companies, where eveything that was once ours has been sold back to us and we're expected to say thank you sir, may we have another... The artists get to leave, see how they do it overseas and maybe not ever come back. In this climate of severe depression and despair, it is everything we can do to keep our heads above the sea of whinging, bobbing heads, always complaining about everything and ready to cut down talent.




At the end of Primavera, when things got drunk and ugly, we got caught in a headlock and told in no uncertain terms that Todd McMillan, while good, aint all that. You know, they whined, he’s alright, he’s kind of funny, but you know, he’s not that great… What happened next was something that we’re going to have to live with for the rest of our lives. We smashed a glass, we busted a chair, we jumped up onto the bar and screamed – IF THERES ANYONE MAN ENOUGH TO GET UP HERE AND TELL US OF ANOTHER ARTIST WITH MORE WIT, HUMANITY, SELF-DEPRECATION, MORE INSIGHT INTO THE FRAILTY OF THE HUMAN CONDITION [WHILE ACKNOWLEDGING THE IRONY OF THE ROMANTIC NOTION OF THE ARTIST], WELL THEN MUTHA-FUKA YOU CAN KISS OUR COLLECTIVE ARSES!!!! You could have heard a pin drop.

Labels: , , ,

Pixel Pirate II: Glittering Premiere!

Monday, September 18, 2006
Only seven days to go until the premiere of Soda_Jerk's four-years-in-the-making sampladelic opus...



"The Year is 3001 and the ancient art of remix is being oppressed by the evil tyrant Moses and his Copyright Commandments. Meanwhile, in a secret base-camp on the moon a team of Pixel Pirates plot to overthrow Moses via their latest scientific discovery - video cloning. Their plan: travel back to 1955, abduct Elvis and bring him back to the future. They then clone Elvis and send the Video Clone back to 2015 to assassinate Moses, altering the course of VHS history. But first the Elvis Clone must face-off against the Copyright Cops and every action hero that MGM can throw his way..."

OFFICIAL LAUNCH

Monday 25 September 2006
5:30 PM Start, Chauvel Cinema
Corner Oxford Street & Oatley Road
Paddington 2021 NSW Australia
Tickets $5 on the door

Labels: ,

Art Life On The Radio




Our appearances on Eastside Radio's Arts Tuesday are now bi-weekly. You can hear all your favourite reviews, gallery round ups and discussions of interesting art world topics with host Sean O'Brien and representatives of this here blog. We appear on Eastside 89.7FM every second Tuesday, from around 10am and chat for about 30 minutes, maybe longer if we have some good jokes to tell. It's a lot like reading this blog, but without all the unnecessary text - and there's the bonus of music too. It's what we call a win-win situation.

Labels: ,

Art World FAQs # 2 – Bad Art

What is ‘bad art’?

Bad art is literally art that is bad. Easy, you say, I know what bad is – but do you? There are eight identifiable types of bad art and it pays to know what’s what.

1. Competition Art. The most easily defined type of bad art, Competition Art is found in many different areas of the art world from humble shows in your local church hall right up to and including media saturated events such as the Archibald Portrait prize. Competition Art is easily spotted due to the artist’s complete lack of traditional skills like the ability to draw hands, master perspective or apply the paint. Typical examples of lower end Comp Art feature trad still-lifes, landscapes and horribly misjudged portraits. At the other end of the scale bad art is often veiled by the artist’s own celebrity, early career or better work, but even the so-called professionals turn out some horrible crap.

2. Café Moderne. Found in cafes and restaurants around the world, Café Moderne is produced by artists who went to art school but missed most of the classes. Although they’re trying, Café Modernists specialise in stylised self-portraits and pets and quote girly modernists like Marc Chagall and Henri Rosseau. Some reach a level of semi-respectability and perhaps even sell a bit of their work, but doomed forever to be seen over a foccacia and a soy latte Café Modernism can only ever hope to graduate Album Cover Art.

3. Tourist Art. This is a kind of art that is hard to spot since it fulfills most people’s expectations of what art is supposed to be. Almost always painting, occasionally sculpture, Tourist Art is big, bright often featuring landmarks, dolphins, penguins and turtles or, if it’s abstract, have titles like City At Night or Desert Moods. A semi-respectable recent development in TA is photographic panoramas of distant lands such as Tasmanian wilderness areas or retreating glaciers in Antarctica. This is a particularly pernicious form of badness since the art asks you to care about the worthy subject while disregarding the aesthetic paucity of the finished piece. Your guilt is meant to be assuaged by the high asking price as a token gesture of your commitment to saving wildernesses or halting global climate change. Highly expensive and soul destroying, Tourist Art is everywhere.

4. Street Art. This is a type of bad art where something that might look good on a wall ends up in a gallery – either a proper gallery with curators with delusions of cred or a gallery where the only work on display is by one artist who does everything from painting the pictures to taking out the garbage – and usually in the wrong order. The last decade has seen a rise in the number of artists who have moved from street to gallery but only the smart ones ditch the tagging for some painterly skills. Remember – just because it’s in a gallery doesn’t make it good.

5. Design Art
. Sneaky and pernicious, Design Art is perpetrated by designers and students with classy aesthetic taste and great visual skills. Often masquerading as “new forms” (installation, web design), you can recognise Design Art by its superior use of colour, form, composition and its total lack of ideas. It may be argued that the lack of ideas is the idea, or that looking good is as much a concept as tackling a subject, but if the artist spends their days designing letter heads and business cards for suits, you know where you are – in the land of Design Art.

6. Oh No, It Isn’t Art. Also known as Try Hard Art or I Can’t Believe [It’s Not Art,] this is a kind of art that looks good from far away or at a glance but when you get up close you suddenly realise the artist hasn’t got a clue. Closely aligned with Design Art, ONIIA is betrayed by its slightly crappy execution and lack of appealing features. Artists making this kind of bad art often exhibit where few artist dare to go – ‘exhibitions’ in bars and pubs, in bus shelters, one-day-only outings in the local hall and is sometimes spotted as décor in apartments in real estate guides.

7. Bad Good Art. This is a tricky form of bad art usually produced by well-known artists supported by popular acclaim but who are secretly shit. They have galleries, they have monographs, and they are included in major museum shows and are sold into corporate collections. But their work is still rubbish.

8. Good Bad Art. Produced by artists who know what they’re doing but are brave enough not to worry if people think they’re Bad, Good Bad Art is hard to spot but the giveaway is that the artist can actually draw.

Labels: ,

Movie Of The Week: Legal Eagles

Monday, September 11, 2006
Plot: New York, 1968. Beautiful Chelsea Deardon is celebrating her 8th birthday with a swinging party in her father’s artist loft/studio in Soho. Chelsea’s old dad is a celebrated painter and he has dedicated a special picture to her with the thoughtful inscription “To Chelsea, my favourite artist, love, Sebastian Deardon.” The birthday party is packed with hippy adults digging the scene, including one very conspicuous man wearing what appears to be a brown long hair wig, one Victor Taft [Terrence Stamp]. Chelsea goes to bed with her prized painting propped up against her dolls house, the rest of the party still going strong downstairs. She drifts off to sleep. Later and without warning the loft/studio catches fire and Chelsea is rescued from the flames by Taft. As she is carried out she notices two things – a] her father’s painting has been taken from her room and b] that her father is being beaten to death by a mysterious stranger. Have you been paying attention? Many of these events will prove SIGNIFICANT later on. Roll opening credits – LEGAL EAGLES, directed by Ivan Reitman, Copyright Universal Pictures, 1986.


Yours sincerely, your father...

Eighteen years later and we find ourselves slap bang in the middle of New York’s go-go art scene circa 1986. Chelsea Deardon has grown up to become Daryl Hannah and she wants her painting back. It seems that Chelsea has worked out who took it and maybe even killed her father – the noted art collector and philanthropist Robert Forrester [John McMartin]. Forrester has the missing painting hanging in his apartment. Chelsea attempts to steal her father’s painting back when she is invited by Forrester’s wife to a party for young artists but is caught and arrested. [Chelsea: “His wife throws parties for young artists, so that way people think she knows art. She’s bored. She likes to wear earrings.”] In an effort to convince the world that the painting is hers, she at first hires feisty legal eagle lawyer Laura J. Kelly [Debra Winger] and when that doesn’t work out, Assistant District Attorney Tom Logan [Robert Redford]. Logan and Kelly team up, and after having dinner with the flirtatious and slightly mad Chelsea, they go to see Forrester. When it turns out Forrester has swapped the painting with Taft for a Picasso, they head downtown to Soho to see Taft, who is now an art dealer with an impressive multi-story gallery space complete with airy atrium and water feature.


The art, it's behind you!


It’s at this point that Legal Eagles heads off in several directions at once. One is the main plot – where is Chelsea’s painting and who killed her father? The second is the confusing back story of the relationship between Chelsea’s dad, Taft, Forrester and the mystery third man. Another plot strand is the romantic comedy relationship between Redford and Winger, the former an ambitious would-be District Attorney with political ambitions, the latter an ambulance chasing defense attorney with an hilarious late night binge-eating problem. Will Tom and Laura get it together, and further, will Chelsea stop flirting with Tom? The last strand of the plot, mixed in with lengthy court room scenes, [and nearly crowded out in a film less than 120 minutes long] – is Chelsea’s own art career.


You'll need a projector and some lighting fx.

The Timeless Appeal of Legal Eagles: Directed by Reitman straight after his success with Ghostbusters in 1984, Legal Eagles is a high gloss romp through a Hollywoodized version of the art world. Some serious and major galleries were credited including Mary Boone, Tony Schafrazi, Leo Castelli, Holly Solomon, Nancy Hoffman and the Pace Gallery and artists including David Salle, Julian Schnabel, Ad Reinhardt, Andy Warhol, Pablo Picasso, Robert Rauschenberg, Jim Dine, Jean Debuffet, Louise Nevelson, Tony Smith, Miro, Elsworth Kelly, Alexander Calder and many more providing real art to hang on the walls. The basic premise of the plot was based on the legal battles over the estate of Mark Rothko, but all of this reality is largely wasted. Legal Eagles does, however, feature one of the great screen artists of all time in the form of Chelsea Deardon, a “performance artist” partly based on Laurie Anderson. “A what?” asks Tom when told by Laura, who knows quite a lot about art. “A performance artist,” she repeats. “A what?” says Tom, squinting his eyes in a way only Redford can do when playing for laughs. It seems Tom doesn’t even know a Picasso when he sees one and needs help at every turn. Late one night, Chelsea turns up at Tom’s apartment and lures him downtown for an impromptu performance, but Laura isn’t there to help him.


Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Oh Superman...


Danger, Performance Art Ahead:
The main visual motif of Legal Eagles is fire – there are three major blazes, an explosion and lots of improbable gun play. Bu the piece de resistance is Chelsea’s sexy, provocative performance art. Accompanied by a soundtrack of sampled voices and beat boxing in an early 80s art world style, Chelsea slinks around her loft making the sorts of improbably banal statements one usually associates with Laurie Anderson - “I was driving down the highway…” she says in doomy reverb, the drum machine clicking away… “When I saw a woman, in a car, by the side of the road…” Boom chick, boom chick… On a series of screens with images of the artist done in the style of Robert Longo, Chelsea projects images of herself when she was 8, going “la la la” like kids do in movies. Then she sets fire to a birthday cake while saying “brush fire”, “old flame” etc… If you were ever thinking of doing a performance yourself, all you need is some bodgy symbolic renderings of things that have happened in your life. Thus, Chelsea uses a lot of fire, and the culmination of the performance after setting fire to a model of her dolls house [we told you you’d need to pay attention at the start], she sets fire to a photo of herself, which burns away to reveal – a mannequin. What do you think Chelsea asks a clearly gobsmacked Tom. “Interesting” he says.


That guy who always plays evil cops playing an evil cop.

The Rest of the Movie: The face reddening highlight of the movie occurs in the first 45 minutes leaving another 45 minutes of tedious plot to get through. The details of the story are far too boring to go into in detail, but in short, the art world is represented to be a bunch of lying, conniving thieves who wouldn’t stop at murder to keep a few paintings. And that’s just not accurate. Tom and Laura get together even though Tom slept with Chelsea [pre-AIDS, Laura isn’t bothered so long as Tom says she has nicer eyes than Chelsea]. And the missing painting? After a lot of detective work including just escaping the Taft Gallery Warehouse [it says on the door] when it explodes, Laura tracks down the missing painting to its secret location hidden inside a marquette by an artist called "Bertollini". Just as they are about to retrieve it, the mystery third man arrives and its that guy who always plays duplicitous cops who turn out to be evil and it is in fact a cop who is in fact the evil third man. He destroys the “Bertollini”, grabs the painting, sets fire to the Taft Gallery while it's full of people gathered for a memorial service for Taft [murdered earlier offscreen by someone or other], and makes a run for the exit. Tom meets him, they fight, arrrgh, the evil guy gets shot, and falls - aieeeeeeee - through the atrium into the water feature. The gallery ablaze, the crowd disperses and, in a fun moment of art world realism, the fleeing guests run from the fire while still holding their drinks. Tom rescues Laura and Chelsea and they escape the flames by shinnying down a Giacometti. As you do.

Overall art world realism: 1/10
Performance art embarrassment realism: 9.5/10
Performance artists madness realism: 7.5/10
Overall film fun factor: 5/10 [first 45 minutes] 2/10 after that.

Labels: , ,

A Black Tie Affair

The directors of firstdraft cordially invite you to the...

firstdraft gallery
20th Anniversary
Commemorative Porcelain Ball


"Firstdraft - one word or two?"


Date: Saturday 7th October, 2006
Venue: Paddington RSL Club
Time: 8:00pm
Dress: Black Tie

Tickets: $10*

With performances by
4 O'Clock Dancers
Matthew Hopkins
C.H.O.D.E. and
The Enthusiasms.

More to be announced...

* Tickets available from firstdraft gallery, or contact directors[at]firstdraftgallery.com


*



twentylove - 20 years of firstdraft Gallery


To mark the twentieth anniversary of firstdraft, the gallery directors present a very special program of exhibitions and events taking over the month of October.

twentylove will launch with aplomb with a Porcelain Ball, and will be highlighted by a profusion of exhibition openings, launches and special events. Over the course of the program the gallery will extend opening hours to Tuesday – Sunday 12–6pm.




Opened in 1986, firstdraft is one of Australia’s most venerable artist-run initiatives (ARI). As an ARI at the grassroots of the arts and wider community, firstdraft continues to provide invaluable space and an ever-expanding program that supports emerging artists and curators in presenting to peers and experimenting with art practice. Countless artists have contributed to Firstdraft over the last twenty years, building a remarkably sustainable ARI that has established a critical mass and legacy within the arts community.

EXHIBITIONS

Plastic Myth
Curated by James Steele
Opening Tuesday 3 October 6 – 8pm, continuing to Sunday 15 October

Only some of the time (banal personal revelations) - Curated by Emma White and Jess Oliveri

The Invisible Reading Room - Presented by The Invisible Inc

Iakovos Amperidis - Firstdraft Studio Resident

Opening Tuesday 12 October 6 – 8pm, continuing to Sunday 29 October



FORUM SERIES

Saturday October 7, 2-4pm
On Approach – Introducing firstdraft in the wider ARI community

Saturday October 14, 2-4pm
On Show – Curators, artists and the Invisible Inc speak

Saturday October 21, 2-4pm
Depature – Different ways of doing things

Saturday October 28, 2-4pm
Onwards – Avenues within the contemporary arts

SPECIAL OPENING EVENTS

20th anniversary Commemorative Porcelain Ball
- Paddington Bowling Club, 8:30pm Friday October 6

Renny Kodgers vs The Monochrome Cowboy in the tennis match of our time
- Saturday October 7


Launch of new firstdraft website and new ARI matchmaker, a nuts & bolts guide to starting up as an artist and getting to know the Sydney and broader arts community.

Firstdraft
116-118 Chalmers St, Surry Hills NSW 2010
t: +61 (0)2 9698 3665 e: mail[at]firstdraftgallery.com
Firstdraft opening hours: Wednesday-Saturday 12-6pm


*


This Is Not Art presents
"Camp for Comment"


Calling all bloggers, indy publishers, radio makers and anyone else that is making their own media...

The This Is Not Art Festival (TINA) and The National Young Writers Festival wants Australian independent media makers to come along to Australia's largest annual gathering of independent media makers and stay and play for FREE!

TINA is the place where Australia's most interesting young writers, media makers, publishers, digital artists, musicians and trouble makers get together and we want you to be there. TINA takes place in Newcastle, NSW over the October long weekend and incorporates The National Young Writers Festival, Sound Summit (independent electronic music and hip-hop festival), Electrofringe (Australia's largest digital media arts festival), The National Student and Emerging Media Conference (Campus newspapers, radio, etc) and much more. It's from Thursday 28th September to Monday 2nd October (the October long weekend in NSW) in Newcastle, NSW.

It's sort of like MySpace only not on a computer, not owned by News Limited and without the idiots.

Who is going to be there?

Independent Media representatives including The Chaser, Is Not, Mess+Noise, Two Thousand, Three Thousand, Frankie, Crikey, Dumbo Feather, Opulent, Un Magazine, Art Crime, The Art Life, Voiceworks, New Matilda, Object Not Found, VICE, Vibewire, the and collective, The Big Issue, Wet Ink, scores of bloggers and zine makers and almost all of Australia's campus newspapers and radio stations.

Music world representatives including people from Hilltop Hoods, Myspace, APRA, FBi Radio, OZ Hip Hop, AIR, iTunes, Checkout Wax, Elefant Traks, The Herd, Supersonic, Decoder Ring, Brighton Boulevard Productions, Pivot, Creative Vibes, Straight Out Of Brisbane, The Bagsmen, Dual Plover, Handsome Tours, My Disco, Bluejuice, and Boudist.

Radio and TV including ABC, SBS, Triple J, ABC Radio National, 2SER, FBI, Triple R, SYN-FM, 4ZZZ, and TIN.

and MANY MORE.

How do I qualify and what do i have to do?

In order to qualify you must be making media:

* Have your own blog, community radio show, podcast, independent publication or web based publication that comes out regularly and have been doing so for at least 3 months. (It doesn't matter what it is about, or where it is hosted but it must be updated regularly and have been published for a while - you can't just set one up so you can come along!)

* Agree to write or say something (anything!) about the festival (even just talking about the fact that you are coming will qualify but a festival review, preview, interview or talking about what it was like if you've been before would be even better). And no, it doesn't even have to be positive! We can also try and help you set up interviews with our other guests if that's to your liking.


What do i get?

* Free entry to about two hundred panels, workshops and sessions at the festival (ok, so they are free anyway!)
* Free accomodation in our campground (we're afraid its BYO tent!)
* Some free drinks and the chance to meet all those people who you only know by pixel and print at our Bloggers Booze Up event on Saturday evening
* The chance to learn a thing or two (and contrinute to our discussions) about everything from writing and editing, publishing, reviewing, legal issues, sedition laws, independent marketing, advertising, DIY pornography, computer game development, zine making and all the other crazy stuff that goes on at the festival
* The opportunity to spend a long weekend hanging out with Australia's largest collection of independent media makers
* The opportunity to spruik your wares at a FREE table TINA's famous Zine Fair - Australia's largest and most diverse collection of indepedent publications

Unfortunately, due to needing to make some money on the door, the offer does not include free entry to our night time gigs but they are great value, will have a killer line-up and there are plenty of free things on every night if they're not your style.

If you don't qualify but you'd still like to come, most sessions are free anyway, camping is cheap (or you can stay with your second cousin in Newcastle if you have one) and we would love to see you there.

How do i get on board?

See This Is Not Art for more information or email Marcus Westbury at campforcomment[at]gmail.com with an outline of who you are what you do and we'll get back to you and let you know if you qualify. Numbers are strcitly limited so it's first in best dressed!

Labels: ,

Missing Matter

Sunday, September 10, 2006
Some things we get right and some things we get wrong. A couple of weeks back when we reviewed Lionel Bawden’s show Dark Matter at GrantPirrie we stated that dark matter was a theoretical form of matter devised by cosmologists to explain a number of curious visible phenomena such as gravitational lensing and the rotation speeds of galaxies. Well, it turns out dark matter actually exists. It’s our pleasure to set the record straight.


"Why you swearing?"


One of our readers named Jason, meanwhile, took umbrage with a passing comment we made in reference to those artists stuck in an ARI holding pattern well past the point of seemliness:

"Middle-aged could have beens'? .. Obviously written by a 20-something wanna be... such petty sniping is just too immature… Believe it or not one day you'll be over 30 so show some respect!"


We’ll have to wait and see what life is like on the other side of 30 and then we’ll get back to you on that one. A couple of other loose usages riled up our readers. We made the claim that Pia Larsen’s work on show at Damien Minton Gallery was “meditative and calming.” Fulnito was annoyed at our inaccurate usage of the word “meditative”:

“I would like to join the bitching by expressing my frustration at the use of the word "meditative" in reviews or artist's statements. In my understanding there are two possibilities in terms of what might be meant by referring to a work as meditative; it induces a meditative state in the viewer or the artist has crystallized a meditative state in the work, (these obviously can be related). So you're either talking about an affect on the viewer or the process that created the work, but the work itself is not meditative.”


This is a good point and we’re glad it has been raised. Of course, what we meant to say was that the work provokes a sense of meditative contemplation in the viewer; the work itself is not meditative per se, it being a construction in metal and having no feelings of its own.

Speaking of feelings, some feathers were ruffled by our review of Shelf Life at MOP. Our basic take on the show was this – good work; nice install; pity about the curatorial concept. We knew that the curator Dr. Daniel Mudie Cunningham wouldn’t have been too thrilled with that assessment, but it turned out that we had made a couple of errors when we first posted the piece and he wrote to point out our shortcomings:

“Hi Art Life, thanks for the review! Just out of curiosity, did you review the exhibition or the catalogue? Samantha Edwards work in the show was photographic and didn't literally sit on shelves in the gallery. Drew Bickford's work in the show was the sculpture of the baby pickled in a jar. The work he submitted in the catalogue was a watercolour. I'm happy to be buried under a mountain of bullshit, as long as you actually see the fucking show. PS. It's Millner not Miller.”


Indeed, we made these errors and we made them for reasons too banal and mundane to go into. However, after Dr. Cunningham had posted his understandably pissed off reply, we made changes to the text to correct the record. Samantha Edwards threw in her two cents worth as well:

“My work is photo documentary and was not contrived or constructed in any way on a shelf for this exhibition. I notice I am now removed from any mention of this exhibition... Dear reviewers get your facts right before you make a review. Be informed. The lack of thought which has gone into your critique says more about you than us! I’m proud and happy to have been part of such a wonderful diverse collection of work. Go Daniel!”


For the record, Edwards takes photographs of things on shelves and should not be – as we did – confused with the work of Sarah Goffman, who puts things on shelves, for real. Edwards is also right in observing that making such mistakes says something about us – to wit – we make mistakes. Sorry about that.

Another artist Kurt Schranzer is in Shelf Life but we omitted to mention this fact in the review. We have now retrospectively reinserted these two names into the original post for the sake of completeness. Mr. Esa Jaske of the Esa Jaske Gallery writes to us:

“Hello Team AL, With regard to the Shelf Life exhibition at MOP - you might be interested in the following: The two works of Kurt Schranzer's at the MOP show (sorry about the anuses, I remember you've had a problem with them in Kurt's work in the past) will be part of our 3 year anniversary exhibitions celebrations in his solo show Le cul mécaniquesize Have a look at the images of the works (& a comprehensive essay of the works) at Kurt Shranzer. Regards, Esa Jaske”


And there we have the heart of the issue - mechanical anuses.

Labels: , , ,

Sanity Clause

Wednesday, September 06, 2006
There must be a point at which you decide it just doesn’t matter anymore. Throw the rule book out, do what you feel and don’t worry about the consequences. This kind of liberation is usually reserved for people who have lost their marbles and don’t mind singing opera at the top of their lungs in the middle of a busy city street or, indeed, for those who no longer have a need for pants. For artists with a significant body of work behind them, liberation from the weight of their own expectation must look like the Promised Land. No longer must they follow the rules and decrees of what is responsible, no longer to be strictured by the unbending governance of their big concept – they just want to break free!

And so we come to the strange case of John Hoyland, a senior British artist spending a gentle winter in Sydney that’s more suited to a man in his 70s. Hoyland has a show with Michael Carr Art Dealer in his swanky Woollahra gallery and the new work is the rudest, freest and craziest show we have seen in years. Hoyland in the 1960s was one of the leading lights of Hard Edged abstraction and many of his very fine colour field style stain paintings ended up in the collections of various museums. From the early 70s, Hoyland started getting funky with texture and now, some 30 odd years later, his latest body of work is a texture extravaganza, the faint echo of those early famous works sounding in the artist’s mind like a futile call for all boats to please return to the hire shed. The works in the Michael Carr show seem to show little regard for conventional colour and compositional niceties, mixing garish colours, vivid greens and reds with splatters and pours over painted burnt reds and royal purple. Considering the paintings a little longer, one begins to realise there is an astute painter’s logic at work, the seemingly random elements marshaled together by the assured hand of someone who’s being doing this stuff for decades.

John Hoyland, Souvenir, 2006.
Acrylic on cotton duck, 172x152cms. Courtesy Michael Carr Art Dealer
.

Michael Carr must have thought that Hoyland needed some quality back up for a show by someone who, although having taught at Melbourne Uni in the 79 and been in shows around the world, isn’t all that well known in Australia. Carr of course turned to The Esteemed Critic for a catalogue essay. Faced with the sheer madness of this show, McDonald was forced to retreat to Hoyland’s impressive CV stating that [the exhibition is] “the work of an artist whose fifty year career now reads as a rehearsal for these paintings. For even if one prefers the works of previous decades, there is no denying that Hoyland is painting with greater freedom than ever before…” But is there such a thing as too much freedom? Hoyland works in two canvas sizes - large and huge. The smaller works betray their architecture and are pent up monsters. The larger ones – such as Souvenir – have more room to breathe and in their freeform bravura step grandly toward the universal aesthetic of Bad Painting, and freedom, horrible freedom.

Ross Laurie, Untitled, 2006.
Oil stick on archers paper, 81x87cms.
Courtesy Damien Minton Gallery.


Damien Minton Gallery in Redfern is a quality space showing quality art. A former employee of Ray Hughes, there’s something of the old boy’s appreciation for meat and potatoes painting at Minton’s own gallery. Sometimes you want to get back to the basics of art – painting and drawing – yet you’re not necessarily enamored of Darwin stubbies at 11am, you’re more a croissant and coffee chap. And there’s nothing wrong with that and Damien Minton Gallery is the place for you. Pia Larsen’s Pink Noise and Ross Laurie’s Paintings and Drawings 2006 at DMG are fine examples of shows by artists without a lot of fancy schmancy grandstanding. Larsen has a forest of free standing sculptures called Bullrushes, abstract figurative shapes that balance on the top of wires and sway in the breeze of a discreetly placed fan. Made from steel and etched with lines and marks, the work is meditative and calming. Her accompanying wall works – Sound Waves – are hand cut aluminium abstract shapes hovering over printed backgrounds. Verging on the fidgety and migraine inducing in their deployment of self conscious design elements, they are still charming distractions. Laurie’s work is reminiscent of Idris Murphy and indeed, Murphy has provided a few words for the catalogue. The work navigates a course between abstraction and figuration and are at their best when they dispense with all the gesture, freeing up their space for a few artfully composed blocks of colour and lines. Perusing the catalogue we find The Esteemed Critic has been here before us again, a paragraph lifted from a very positive review of Laurie’s work from June 2005. It certainly lets you know where you are.

Mark Seliger, Cindy Sherman.
Courtesy Sandra Byron Gallery.


It pays an artist not to be too clever. Obviousness never really hurt anyone, so long as it is mixed with a little pinch of ambiguity or layered with technical bravura. At Sandra Byron Gallery, the work of celebrity photographer Mark Seliger demonstrates how a bloke who does covers for Vanity Fair and GQ spends his free time – he does the same thing, only at home. In My Stairwell is a collection of portraits of Seliger’s famous mates posing in front of a brick wall in his stairwell [hence the descriptive title]. There’s Cindy Sherman, Mathew Barney and Jeff Koons, there’s David Bowie, Mick ‘n’ Keef, Burning Spear and Ben Harper. Working on a level of obviousness that mere mortals can only aspire to, Seliger has his subjects bring an object that says something about their character – Sherman has a camera, Laurie Anderson has a violin, Lou Reed has a leather t-shirt. All of this horribleness is buried under a silvery sheen courtesy of a very nice, very classy palladium print that makes all the images look as though they have been printed on mercury.

Samantha Edwards, 9 Cudgee Rd, 2006.
Giclee print on archival gloss.
Courtesy MOP and the artist.



The exhibition Shelf Life at MOP [where did the “Projects” go?] has an audio component that’s not as obvious as it should be. Listen with us for a second and maybe you can hear it… No? It’s the sound of a long bow being drawn, to wit:

"The ‘shelf life’ of a product refers to the amount of time it can be stored before it spoils or becomes obsolete. Generally the ‘shelf’ in question is a retail space allotted for the display of consumer goods. Shelves, then, are temporal zones that see items coming and going according to highs and lows in consumer demand: when we want the product it gets restocked, when we don’t, it goes to waste. These ideas provide a rich source of meaning for artists when the conventions of use and display, as it relates to art practice, are considered. Simply speaking: shelves speak to the things we collect, promote display and status, thereby elevating the very ‘thingness’ of our things. When, conversely, the whims of fashion, taste and novelty wear thin, that same shelved stuff lies dormant and abandoned, left to collect dust. As mnemonic devices, objects shelved are meaningful only because they’re attached to memories that risk being eventually forgotten. And forgotten is what often happens to objects filed away, shelved out of sight. As an exhibition featuring new work by eleven contemporary artists, Shelf Life engages with the lives of shelves, the shelves of life, life on the shelf, shelf life.”


Ahem. We spend quite a lot of time in supermarkets looking for obscure items, but it never occurred to us to look at the shelf as a mnemonic device that reveals the “thingness of things”. [Attention Martin Heidegger, clean up in aisle 4!] Dr. Daniel Mudie Cunningham, curator, has fashioned a very handsome group show of artists whose work might, in one way or another, illustrate this bold and overlooked curatorial gambit. We are certainly happy to consider even the most way out and wackiest curatorial ideas, but the work in Shelf Life is more a bargain bin of odds and sods than a coherent statement. While some artists make work that literally sits on shelves – Lionel Bawden, and Sarah Goffman for example – others are far more oblique, playing off the tangential implications of the title. So we get old work by Adam Cullen - a book he scribbled in when he was a kid, Elvis Richardson’s creepy Canberra murder case, Prudence Murphy’s photos of toy soldiers in a bathtub, Drew Bickford’s watercolours pickled baby in a jar, Cash Brown’s mutants, Kurt Schranzer's mechanical anuses and Samantha Edwards photos of stuff on shelves... We defy anyone to walk into this show and understand the connections without using the preposterous catalogue essays as a road map. Dr. Jacqueline Millner, another academic with a few hundred words up her sleeve, makes this observation:

"the comparison between [the art market] trade in objects of cultural value and everyday perishables, between the supermarket and the museum display case, is inescapable. So is the underpinning capitalist imperative of the shelf life; it exists to protect the manufacturer, providing a strictly limited guarantee of quality, after whose expiration the buyer takes all risk.”


And there we were thinking use-by dates were there to protect the consumer from spoiled and rotten produce. Makes you wonder how long such lame cultural studies speak has been sitting on the back of the shelf - it stinks. But the far more troubling thing here – and something that is becoming a real bug bear for us – is the number of times we come across half-arsed usage of Marx's critique of political economy. How many more times must we struggle through catalogue essays with writers dropping in knowing references to "use value” and “ exchange value” with nary an acknowledgement of the contentious complexity of such terminology?

Reading the recent 100th issue of Frieze magazine, we found a discussion between art writers and critics that observed that all too often in art criticism today the tendency is to review the curator and the theme while actually leaving out whatever individual appeal certain art works might have. Shelf Life is a prime example of a show that, despite its hare brained curatorial theme, brings together some pretty decent work. The pity is it’s buried under a mountain of bullshit.

Art World FAQs #1 - Artists.

Monday, September 04, 2006
I want to become an artist. Should I go to art school?

Going to art school may well extinguish any natural talent you already have, so it would be unwise to go into debt just to find out. However, not going to art school isn’t much of an option either since art school, like regular high schools and universities, are just as much about becoming socialized in the art world as they are about holding a brush or a camera. And you might be really nice looking and therefore be very popular in life drawing class. So go.

I am interested in the latest philosophical theories as they are applied to the visual arts. Would going to art school be a good idea for me?

Yes, but it depends on which art school you go to. Some are specifically designed for people with little interest in art history but lots of enthusiasm ideas and concepts. You wouldn’t be very happy at an educational institution that only taught the sharpening of pencils and considering your palette. Not only would you not learn about the latest philosophical theories, you wouldn’t be able to use your degree for very much besides teaching others how to sharpen their pencils. You’d be better off looking for an art school that does teach theory and its application in the visual arts and is a school attached to a university [so you can use that degree later on]. But before you go, ask yourself this question – would I be better off actually studying philosophy?

Will going to art school guarantee me success as an artist?

The chances of “making it” in the art world are extremely slim. In Australia there are more than 50 art schools producing on average 50 to 100 graduates each per year. But there are only 10 to 20 contemporary art galleries in Melbourne and Sydney with perhaps a dozen exhibiting artists each. The chances are therefore stacked against you. You might be one of the three or four graduates who luck into decent commercial representation straight out of art school, but it will probably take ten to 15 years to become self sufficient as an artist, by which time the numbers will have narrowed. Chances are you will no longer be an artist by then anyway, but don’t fret, you can always become an art dealer, a curator or arts writer.

I have recently graduated from art school and I’m looking for representation in a commercial gallery. Which one should I choose?

Whoa there buster – which one should you choose? The art dealer of your choice has to choose you, and it’s usually on their terms. The way to get commercial representation is to act coy by having shows in artist run galleries while pretending you have no real interest in the commercial game. Sending slides of your work and a CV attached to a politely worded covering letter is the same as saying “I’m desperate, take advantage of me.” The next step is to wait for the gallery owners to come knocking.

I have been waiting for commercial gallery dealers to come knocking at my door but so far no one has come around. Am I doing something wrong?

You may be playing the “I’m not interested” thing a little too well. You’ll need to let artists already with commercial representation at the gallery of your choice know you’d certainly be interested in talking, to see how things might develop, and that might generate some sparks with the dealer. Alternatively, you might have waited too long and are now considered to be part of the artist run world of middle aged could-have-beens. In which case, career alternatives now come into play.

I am represented by a commercial gallery and I sell my work once every eighteen months – is that all there is?

The realisation that commercial representation isn’t all it’s cracked up to be is dawning on you. If you’re asking yourself why your gallerist isn’t selling your works into important collections, why they haven’t sold a piece to a museum, why they won’t let you show your work in a group show in an artist run gallery, why they won’t let someone use your work on a book cover, why they haven’t actually paid you for the last show and why there are outstanding accounts from ten years ago, then maybe that dealer isn’t the right one for you after all.

I’m what you’d call a mid-career artist looking for a new gallery. Is it the same deal all over again?

Unfortunately it is.

I fear that my work is mediocre. Will buying the most expensive art supplies give me the edge I’m looking for?


Yes. People respect cotton duck or Belgian linen much more than the stretcher you bought from the Crazy Bargains Store.

My work has never been chosen for inclusion in a museum show. Why?


There are a number of possible answers. You may be making work that is far too unique to be in a museum show because most of those kinds of exhibitions are about finding work that fits into a common theme. Being too unique is a problem. On the other hand, your work may be too generic and lacks any identifiably original qualities that would mean your work was similar but not the same, whereas your work is similar and the same. You might try switching from Belgian linen to crappy canvases and see what happens.

Blogs of Dub

Resistance is futile. I have spent the last few weeks battling the art demons in my head that taunt, "Write something about the 2006 Biennale of Sydney, Zones of Contact?" I'd reply: "And just how does one stretch the phrase 'I was bored shitless' over several paragraphs when I could instead renew my World Movies subscription – setting the VCR during anthropological documentary hour."

Eventually the demon forced some Artswipe commentary when I encountered a tiny cost-efficient flyer the other day at a Sydney artist run space. The small piece of paper was appealing for volunteers to dismantle Antony Gormley's massive installation, Asian Field, held at Pier 2/3 Walsh Bay...

Docile Biennales, The Artswipe

*




Post Secret


*


I'm once again amazed that, if it weren't for The Australian, the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Award would get virtually no coverage in the Australian press. Miriam Cosic wrote three articles in the space of a week, Rothwell contributed his usual trenchant analysis, and the Sydney and Melbourne papers had nothing to say? What's the deal here? ABC Radio chipped in with a good pre-show interview with Franchesca Cubillo and a rather pointless piece last Friday with Djon Mundine, both on Awaye! The National Indigenous Times had a short profile of Ngoia Napaltjarri along with a notice of the other winners. And that's all they wrote.

Talking About the Art Award at Twenty-Three Aboriginal Art & Culture

*


I’ve been working on my novel, which I intend to be the Great American Novel, except I’m Polish-Australian and not American.

The [Internet] Tife & Limes of Kuba Dorabialski

*





Fettes Flog


*


About Open Source Art School: This is an example of a WordPress page, you could edit this to put information about yourself or your site so readers know where you are coming from. You can create as many pages like this one or sub-pages as you like and manage all of your content inside of WordPress.

Open Source Art School.com

*


Adventures with Form in Space is the theme of this year’s Balnaves Sculpture Project at the AGNSW. And it is a particularly good year. Hot on the heels of NASA’s announcement that Dark Matter exists, comes Nike Savvas’s accurately title installation Atomic: full of love, full of wonder. It is an amazing room of freeze framed atoms that apart from some maverick dad letting his daughter play and tug at the sculpture, leaves the assembled viewers quietly agog. Suspended polystyrene balls held in place on nylon wire fill the room in a rough grid, running though the spectrum from reds to blues up the room with a few rogue orange balls escaping their hue, bubbling up into the cooler tones.

Atomic Ballroom, Gravestmor

*





Camera Toss


*


Deleuzian immersion sounds all well and good as a radical epistemology - but the exigencies of PhD production have meant that I've had to fall back on good old enlightenment models of "Me: expert". "You:subject" I will stand apart and above you and I will tell you what you are, and make money doing so. It's a shite state of affairs really.

Fine Lines, Art and Mayhem

*


Irangraffiti shows the First attempts and tries To paint the walls and Communicating as an alive Art Media. Beside Kolahstudio Urban art projects ,which had resulted well among visitors and new arrival followers,We had decided to take and collect photos and documentaries of iranian graffiti, intoducing new Artists and publishing events for international friends.

Iran Graffiti Manifesto, Kholah Studio