«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Oil Spill an Avoidable Homeland Disaster
Last week's oil spill in San Francisco makes one thing painfully clear: we should, and don't, know better.
The early story was that the spill wasn't much. The main question addressed in just-after coverage was whether the Cosco Busan's collision with the Bay Bridge would affect traffic. The spill total? 140 gallons. That's a bundle of fill-ups, not good for the Bay by any stretch, but handleable, especially given the resources available, Coast Guard and otherwise. The clean-up? A month, said the rep from Fish and Game.
The cargo ship, en route to South Korea, hit the bridge at 8:30 Wednesday morning, but it wasn't until nearly 5pm that the Coast Guard realized that not 140 but 58,000 gallons of bunker oil (essentially container-ship fuel) were loose in the Bay, constituting the largest spill in the area in almost two decades. The spill, which inexplicably wasn't contained via a boom for hours, thus was spreading in all directions, including several miles out through the Golden Gate and into the open ocean.
The one benefit of oil in water is that because of the separation it's initially easy to track and, where response is swift, contain. So why wasn't a boom, which would have isolated the spill to the area directly surrounding the ship, utilized almost immediately? No telling yet, but early on Fish and Game said that private companies would handle the spill cleanup, companies hired by the ship's owners. Huh? That's the proper response an environmental and homeland security hazard? Let the industry mop up?
California Senator Dianne Feinstein, who toured the spill this morning, has criticized those in charge for the slow response. She said she plans to meet with DHS-head Michael Chertoff this week to discuss better disaster response and preparedness.
Rescue and clean-up crews (and volunteers) have been scrambling for days, cleaning as many dying birds as possible, bagging oiled sand, and in general trying to triage the damage. Thus far the spill has contaminated 40 miles of waters and 20 beaches (map here), and has killed at least 171 birds, with 372 rescued birds awaiting cleaning. And it's not just the birds we need to worry about. Fish and other marine life are under threat as well, putting not only ecosystems at risk, and the area's entire seafood economy could be compromised for who knows how long.
Bottom line is, the spread of the spill was preventable. We have the technology and the wherewithal to respond to minor spills and contain them, and didn't. And that we didn't do so in a major metropolitan area with vast resources at our disposal (and it's not the first time) is less than encouraging. It also makes one wonder how many leaks on the open seas go unreported and unabated? If we can't get it together to protect the San Francisco Bay, home of the iconic Golden Gate Bridge, what do we think goes on where the only witnesses are wildlife?
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Elizabeth Gettelman on 11/11/07 at 2:32 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
I read they were sending potential volunteers home and others were told to get off the beach.
The whole mess is just so sad.
Posted by: capt on 11/11/07 at 7:21 PM Respond
Must we use the phrase *homeland*?
Posted by: annie on 11/12/07 at 6:22 AM Respond
I was out of town when this happened, avoiding my inbox, phone and computer with hopes of actually relaxing on vacation. I got wind that there was a spill but that was all I really heard. We had been wondering and worried about the details. Thank you for your wonderful article and analysis. It was a good one -- posing what are critical questions I think we have the responsibility to answer.
Posted by: Samara Link on 11/12/07 at 12:33 PM Respond
I quite agree, Annie, but I'm thinking that the *security* part bothers me more than the *homeland* part...
You feel secure? Knowing that these DHS guys will show up -- eventually -- to let industry know that they are responsible to clean up the mess? Sounds tough, doesn't it? It's not, though...
Where are the timelines? Where are the standards? What are the consequences? The "industry" couldn't give a toss so long as it doesn't interrupt carrier operations or disturb the bottom line too much...
And my guess is that the monkeys from Washington DC couldn't give a toss, either. The last DHS guys are out of California on a flight next week only to return 4 days after the next disaster...
Homeland? Security? That's b*llsh*t on both counts...
Posted by: kurk mulligan on 11/12/07 at 1:33 PM Respond
I used to work for an oil brokerage in Irvine called Petro Diamond. I was there only about one year but was able to monitor many incidents of unrefined oil being spilled into the ocean. These spills never made the headlines. It was inside industry info. I wish I would have kept a journal documenting these spills. But I didn't.
Posted by: CJ on 11/12/07 at 2:29 PM Respond
Annie has a good point in the terminology we use. "Homeland" rings echoes of the focus on the "fatherland" that the Social Democrats were known for. And Kurk is more than right that the "security" part of the moniker is an outright joke.
The planet Earth is my homeland, and America's so-called "Homeland Security" has virtually nothing to do with the welfare or security of the planet.
They seem to exist solely as a convenient target for public rage over our government's response to catastrophies like Katrina, the CA fires, and this oil spill.
The government screws up yet another disaster response, and the HSD takes the heat; while the real culprit, one Mr. George Walker Bush (maybe you've heard of him?) lies low in his Washington hideout composing another propaganda diatribe for the radio audience.
I've had it.
Impeach.
Impeach now.
Posted by: Danno on 11/12/07 at 4:32 PM Respond
Sorry Danno.
That's "OFF The Table".
And if the Repubs try to help Kucinich put it back ON The Table, why we'll just have to jerk it and send it back to committee "for further study".
Now, if you'll just send us lots and lots of money, vote us to a 100% majority and put a Clinton back in the Oral Office in 2008, I PROMISE you we'll do whatever is necessary to impeach both Bush and Cheney!!
Posted by: LeaderSheep on 11/12/07 at 4:51 PM Respond
I agree with Annie and Kurk... I just can't hear the term "homeland security" without waffling between nausea and laughter. My reaction is either "NOBODY could come up with a more jingoistic and orwellian term if they tried" (and I'm quite sure they did try just that) and "OH SHIT they really mean it!" Sadly the latter invariably wins out while the first is only a defense against the appalling truth. And that's without them even saying "homesec"... Minipax anyone?
War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength... could there be a more appropriate motto for the results of bushcheney's Project for a New American Apocalypse?
Posted by: Fitzhugh on 11/12/07 at 5:27 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Oil Spill an Avoidable Homeland Disaster (8)
Fitzhugh wrote:
I agree with Annie and Kurk... I just can't hear the term ...
[more]
Beating Up On Barney Frank (7)
Truth Hurt? wrote:
Yeah, re-read the article.
No doubt many Repubs have love...
[more]
Little Steven Goes to Washington...and Wants To See Laura Bush (2)
Maureen Fahlberg wrote:
Music has been used to teach math for many years and very ...
[more]
Ron Paul's Legislative Record Must Be Considered (23)
trippin wrote:
Social Security? Privatize it. Medicare? Dismantle it...
[more]
HMO Pays Staffers to Drop Sick People (4)
Cherry Crum wrote:
Health care even when you have it, is a laugh. My last job...
[more]
Obama Attacks and Nobody Notices (3)
Jim Hyder wrote:
John Edwards is honest about his involvement about the vot...
[more]
Dear Hillary: Success Trumps Sisterhood Every Time (3)
kirkbrew wrote:
Chris Rock said this months ago on SNL. The basic fact i...
[more]
Prez Candidates: Schools? What Schools? (1)
thechuck wrote:
"interactive chart" link broken....
[more]
Iranian-American Scholar Fears War Within Months—Can He Help Stop It? (2)
capt wrote:
Is it possible cooler heads will prevail?
from:
http:/...
[more]
Finally, Cable a la Carte? (3)
jet wrote:
["Technologically, the only way they can offer a-la-carte ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
RECENT ENTRIES
Iranian-American Scholar Fears War Within Months—Can He Help Stop It?
Prez Candidates: Schools? What Schools?
Little Steven Goes to Washington...and Wants To See Laura Bush
IPOA Smackdown: DynCorp vs. Blackwater
Dear Hillary: Success Trumps Sisterhood Every Time
HMO Pays Staffers to Drop Sick People
Finally, Cable a la Carte?
Obama Attacks and Nobody Notices
Ron Paul's Legislative Record Must Be Considered